2012
DOI: 10.3917/redp.224.0547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Piecework versus merit pay: a mean field games approach to academic behavior

Abstract: This paper applies the mean Field game approach pioneered by Lasry and Lions (2007) to the analysis of the researchers' academic productivity. It provides a theoretical motivation for the stability of the universally observed Lotka's law. It shows that a remuneration scheme taking into account the researchers rank with respect to the academic resume can induce a larger number of researchers to overtake a minimal production standard. It thus appears as superior to piecework remuneration.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remunerations usually depend on the relative position of researchers among peers and should not necessarily be increasing with Ni(t): more realistic model should take into account this dimension (for instance, see Besancenot et al . () for a model in which rankings influence the researchers' remuneration). However, this cannot be taken into account in this model where all iresearchers present the same instantaneous academic production.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remunerations usually depend on the relative position of researchers among peers and should not necessarily be increasing with Ni(t): more realistic model should take into account this dimension (for instance, see Besancenot et al . () for a model in which rankings influence the researchers' remuneration). However, this cannot be taken into account in this model where all iresearchers present the same instantaneous academic production.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%