2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1801.01018
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pierre Auger Observatory and Telescope Array: Joint Contributions to the 35th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC 2017)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite of these differences, a remarkable agreement in the energy scale of the two observatories is found up to about 10 19.4 eV. As demonstrated in Figure 3 (left panel) [22], re-scaling the energy scale of each experiment by only 5.2 %, which is well within the aforementioned systematic uncertainties of the two experiments, provides an excellent agreement of their measured fluxes. However, above this energy, larger differences remain present, which cannot be accounted for by an independent scaling of their reconstructed energies.…”
Section: Open Questions In Cosmic-ray Research At Ultrahigh Energiessupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Despite of these differences, a remarkable agreement in the energy scale of the two observatories is found up to about 10 19.4 eV. As demonstrated in Figure 3 (left panel) [22], re-scaling the energy scale of each experiment by only 5.2 %, which is well within the aforementioned systematic uncertainties of the two experiments, provides an excellent agreement of their measured fluxes. However, above this energy, larger differences remain present, which cannot be accounted for by an independent scaling of their reconstructed energies.…”
Section: Open Questions In Cosmic-ray Research At Ultrahigh Energiessupporting
confidence: 63%
“…An additional compensation can be picked up by using also the Telescope Array (TA) observations. TA has accumulated an exposure ∼ 8, 300 km 2 sr yr without observation of events above 10 11.3 GeV [89]. After removing the band of declination common to both experiments this becomes a ∼ 10% effect.…”
Section: New Limit On the Lifetime Of Shdmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there may be a significant statistical discrepancy in the energy spectra between Auger and TA around the suppression energy. The TA results show a relatively higher flux, and the reason is still unclear yet [106]. In this section, we aim to fit the energy spectrum and composition of UHECR nuclei detected by Auger [38] and TA [107,108].…”
Section: B Comparison With Auger and Ta Datamentioning
confidence: 99%