2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.scaman.2014.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pierre Bourdieu in management and organization studies—A citation context analysis and discussion of contributions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
11

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
(134 reference statements)
0
40
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The citation content analysis study by Sieweke (2014) investigated the influence of French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu on 352 citing papers published in nine leading journals in management and organization studies. The SSCI was used to collect papers.…”
Section: 1211mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The citation content analysis study by Sieweke (2014) investigated the influence of French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu on 352 citing papers published in nine leading journals in management and organization studies. The SSCI was used to collect papers.…”
Section: 1211mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anderson and Sun (2010) analysed citations in the context of Walsh and Ungson's work (1991) on organisational memory. Sieweke (2014) carried out research into Pierre Bourdieu's influence on management and organisation studies. Finally, Lu, Ding and Zhang (2017) focused on the citation dynamics of Hirsh (2005) over a period of nine years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Sieweke () recommended, we considered in this analysis the potential power struggles among actors. Indeed, this sub‐section shows how aspiring global actors, by asserting their specificities and their difference with members of an established global elite contribute to reinforcing the acceptance of a mindset that splits the field into two groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, they emphasise the positive effects of social interactions encouraged by global mindset or, conversely, see global mindset only as a positive externalisation of those interactions. The fact that these studies only use sociological concepts such as ‘social capital’ in a piecemeal fashion, disconnecting them from other related concepts (habitus, field and doxa) thus failing to consider the potential power struggles among actors (Sieweke, ), may partly explain this limitation. Finally, the empirical results obtained so far are limited and, in some cases, tautological (individuals endowed with greater capital prove better at developing relationships).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%