As a result of the growing population in Switzerland, new infrastructure is increasingly founded in areas of extremely soft clays, which are challenging to build on. Reliable characterisation of such sediments is, therefore, essential to facilitate efficient and economical designs. For various reasons, it is often beneficial to measure soil properties in-situ, using probes like the piezocone or self-boring pressuremeter. The main objective of this study is to explore the key differences of these two site investigation techniques in terms of measuring undrained strength and consolidation characteristics in varved lacustrine clay. Experimental data from a field-testing campaign carried out in Switzerland demonstrates that both probes yield comparable results. The quality of the predictions is further assessed by comparing the field measurements to results from laboratory tests and existing empirical relationships. Additionally, a new method based on Monte Carlo Simulations is presented, to provide context to the disparity between the consolidation coefficients estimated in the field (c<sub>h</sub>) and laboratory (c<sub>v</sub>), and to aid prediction of field values of c<sub>h</sub> from laboratory measurements.