2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.09.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Piezospectroscopic evaluation and damage identification for thermal barrier coatings subjected to simulated engine environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The objective magnitude was selected to be 10 × to ensure a laser beam spot size much larger than the grain size of TGO 41 . The laser was focused on the TBCs sample surface, and the previous study 39 confirmed an insignificant influence of the depth of focus. An in‐plane area of 3 mm × 3 mm was measured point‐by‐point by moving the focused laser beam to generate a residual stress map.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The objective magnitude was selected to be 10 × to ensure a laser beam spot size much larger than the grain size of TGO 41 . The laser was focused on the TBCs sample surface, and the previous study 39 confirmed an insignificant influence of the depth of focus. An in‐plane area of 3 mm × 3 mm was measured point‐by‐point by moving the focused laser beam to generate a residual stress map.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the relationship between the peak shift and compressive stress was used to calculate the TGO residual stress, which is expressed in following Equation 41 :νsν0=normalΠitalicij×σitalicij,where νS is the peak position for the stressed state, ν0 is the peak position for the stress‐free state, Πij is piezo‐spectroscopic coefficient (PSC), and σij is the stress state in the crystallographic basis of the host crystal. As the TGO can be regarded as a thin film, the stress state is presumed to be biaxial (ie, σXX¯=σYY¯,σZZ¯=0), and the biaxial residual stress σXX¯ or trueσitalicYY¯ can be finally determined as 41 νsν0=23false(Π11+Π22+Π33false)×σitalicxxHerein, PSC values of 7.59 cm −1 /GPa and 7.61 cm −1 /GPa for R1 and R2, respectively, were used according to Manero et al 39 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations