Piezospectroscopic measurement of the stress field around an indentation crack tip in ruby using SEM cathodoluminescence

Todd, Richard I.; Stowe, David; Galloway, S.A.; Barnes, David; Wilshaw, Peter R.

doi:10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.02.008

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Residual stresses in ceramics have previously been investigated by curvature measurement (for machining stresses), 7 Xray diffraction, 3,11 neutron diffraction, 4 cathodoluminescence microscopy (CLM) [12][13][14] and photoluminescence microscopy (PLM). [1][2][3][4][5]15,16 PLM involves the illumination of the specimen by a laser focused through the objective lens of an optical microscope.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Confocal fluorescence microscopy in alumina-based ceramics: Where does the signal come from?

Guo¹,

Todd²

2010

Journal of the European Ceramic Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Confocal fluorescence microscopy in alumina-based ceramics: Where does the signal come from?

Guo¹,

Todd²

2010

Journal of the European Ceramic Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Review: Coefficients for Stress, Temperature, and Composition Effects in Fluorescence Measurements of Alumina

Cook

Michaels

2017

J. RES. NATL. INST. STAN.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The numerical coefficients linearly relating the effects of stress (including pressure), temperature, and composition to shifts in the energies of the Cr-related fluorescence in alumina (Al2O3) are reviewed. The primary focus is the shift of the R1 and R2 “ruby” fluorescence lines under conditions typical for stress determination in polycrystalline Al2O3. No significant experimental difference in the R1 and R2 responses is observed for hydrostatic stress (or pressure) conditions (average shift coefficient of about 7.6 cm−1/GPa), changes in temperature (about 0.140 cm−1/K), or variations in composition (about 120 cm−1/mass fraction of Cr). There are significant differences in the R1 and R2 responses for nonhydrostatic stress conditions. In particular, for uniaxial stress along the a and c directions in the Al2O3 crystal, the R1 piezospectroscopic tensor coefficients (about 3.0 cm−1/GPa and 1.6 GPa cm−1/GPa, respectively) differ considerably, whereas the R2 coefficients (about 2.6 cm−1/GPa and 2.3 GPa cm−1/GPa, respectively) do not. Measurements of the piezospectroscopic tensor coefficients are shown to have interlaboratory relative consistency of about 4 % extending over 30 years, and are consistent with the scalar high-pressure measurements. Measurements of the temperature coefficients are shown to have interlaboratory relative consistency less than 1 % extending over 60 years. Fluorescence-based measurements of stress in polycrystalline Al2O3, although requiring temperature adjustment, are shown to have a relative uncertainty of about 2.5 %.

show abstract

Piezospectroscopic measurement of the stress field around an indentation crack tip in ruby using SEM cathodoluminescence

Cited by 2 publications

References 18 publications

Confocal fluorescence microscopy in alumina-based ceramics: Where does the signal come from?

Confocal fluorescence microscopy in alumina-based ceramics: Where does the signal come from?

Review: Coefficients for Stress, Temperature, and Composition Effects in Fluorescence Measurements of Alumina

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About