2020
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-01933-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pigmented villonodular synovitis does not influence the outcomes following cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: a case-control study with minimum 5-year follow-up

Abstract: Background Pigmented villonodular synovitis (PVNS) is a rare synovial disease with benign hyperplasia, which has been successfully treated with total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to investigate the middle-term follow-up outcomes of cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA in patients with PVNS. Methods From January 2012 to December 2014, a retrospective study was conducted in 17 patients with PVNS who underwent CR TKA as PVNS group. During this period, we also selected 68 patients with osteoarth… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the selected studies, the first goal was to highlight the design and degree of constraint of the prosthetic implants adopted by authors in PVNS osteoarthritis. Most of papers reported the use of non-constrained design implant such as posterior stabilized (PS) or cruciate retaining (CR) models, obtaining satisfying outcomes [ 2 4 , 20 , 21 , 24 , 25 ]. Although these implant designs lead to comparable results in clinical and functional scores improvement, in PVNS osteoarthritis, PS system may be preferable over the CR one, as it allows a more extensive joint exposure, necessary to perform an accurate synovial debridement [ 4 , 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the selected studies, the first goal was to highlight the design and degree of constraint of the prosthetic implants adopted by authors in PVNS osteoarthritis. Most of papers reported the use of non-constrained design implant such as posterior stabilized (PS) or cruciate retaining (CR) models, obtaining satisfying outcomes [ 2 4 , 20 , 21 , 24 , 25 ]. Although these implant designs lead to comparable results in clinical and functional scores improvement, in PVNS osteoarthritis, PS system may be preferable over the CR one, as it allows a more extensive joint exposure, necessary to perform an accurate synovial debridement [ 4 , 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%