The identity of the pigment responsible for the light-induced 518 nanometer absorbance change was investigated by extraction and reconstitution of spinach chloroplasts. Heptane extraction of carotene and quinones from lyophilized chloro. plasts removes absorbance changes at 518 and 475 nanometers activated by both laser flash and continuous illumination. Some electron transport activity is always present, even in carotene-and quinone-depleted chloroplasts, but the light-induced pH increase disappears following the first extraction step. Readdition of pure 8-carotene partially restores the 518 and 475 nanometer absorbance changes.Duysens (10) first reported reversible absorbance changes at 518 nm arising from the illumination of Chlorella cells by red light. The absorbance increase at 518 nm (hereafter called A,,,), accompanied by a corresponding absorbance decrease at 475 nm, has since been observed in a variety of plants (4,14) and algae (7,12,23). The pigment producing A,8 has not been identified, although either /3-carotene (6, 26) or chl a or b (13, 18) has been proposed.The present investigation shows that the removal of /3-carotene from chloroplasts completely inhibits the 518 nm absorbance change while only partially inhibiting electron transfer and, by implication, chlorophyll photooxidation. Furthermore, reconstitution of the chloroplasts using pure /3-carotene restores an absorbance change which is spectrally identical with A518-
MATERIALS AND METHODSChloroplast Isolation. Chloroplasts were isolated from 60 g of deribbed spinach leaves (Spinacia oleracea). It was imperative that the tissue came from fresh leaves which were picked, washed, and stored in the cold as rapidly as possible. through four layers of cheesecloth and the filtrate was centrifuged at 500g for 30 sec. The supernatant was then centrifuged at i5OOg for 10 min, and the resulting pellet was resuspended in a minimal volume of isolating medium to give a final concentration of 2 to 4 mg chl/ml.Extraction of Chloroplasts. Isolated chloroplasts were lyophilized to dryness. Part of the original pellet was not lyophilized, but was stored in the dark at 0 C to be used as a control sample. An unlyophilized control sample was necessary because lyophilized chloroplasts invariably had lower activities than samples which were lyophilized and then rapidly swirled in heptane before drying and resuspension (cf. 2, 3).Lyophilized chloroplasts, containing about 10 mg of chl, were ground to a powder and shaken in 10 ml of heptane for 2 min on a reciprocal shaker. The suspension was centrifuged, the extract was decanted, a chloroplast sample was withdrawn, and fresh heptane was added. After the final extract was decanted, residual heptane was evaporated under vacuum. The dried, extracted chloroplasts were resuspended in a medium identical to the isolating medium but at pH 7.0. The entire extraction was conducted at 0 to 4 C. Reconstitution. Reconstitution was by a method similar to that of Emster et al. (11). Extracted chloroplasts were incubated w...