2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-021-04042-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PIGNON: a protein–protein interaction-guided functional enrichment analysis for quantitative proteomics

Abstract: Background Quantitative proteomics studies are often used to detect proteins that are differentially expressed across different experimental conditions. Functional enrichment analyses are then typically used to detect annotations, such as biological processes that are significantly enriched among such differentially expressed proteins to provide insights into the molecular impacts of the studied conditions. While common, this analytical pipeline often heavily relies on arbitrary thresholds of s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Healthy control tears were tagged with light formaldehyde (+28 Da) and SS patients’ tears with heavy formaldehyde (+34 Da; Figure 1A ). Data were analyzed using MaxQuant ( Cox and Mann, 2008 ) ( Cox et al, 2011 ) at a 1% false discovery rate (FDR), and data integration for pathway and gene ontology (GO) enrichment was performed with Metascape ( Zhou et al, 2019 ), STRING-db ( Szklarczyk et al, 2019 ) and PIGNON ( Nadeau et al, 2021 ). For the data interpretation, we describe changes in abundance of proteins as log2 fold change (SS tears over healthy controls), which means log2 values > 0 represent proteins that were upregulated in SS tears, <0 represents downregulation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Healthy control tears were tagged with light formaldehyde (+28 Da) and SS patients’ tears with heavy formaldehyde (+34 Da; Figure 1A ). Data were analyzed using MaxQuant ( Cox and Mann, 2008 ) ( Cox et al, 2011 ) at a 1% false discovery rate (FDR), and data integration for pathway and gene ontology (GO) enrichment was performed with Metascape ( Zhou et al, 2019 ), STRING-db ( Szklarczyk et al, 2019 ) and PIGNON ( Nadeau et al, 2021 ). For the data interpretation, we describe changes in abundance of proteins as log2 fold change (SS tears over healthy controls), which means log2 values > 0 represent proteins that were upregulated in SS tears, <0 represents downregulation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To better understand and visualize our data, we used two additional bioinformatics tools, PIGNON ( Nadeau et al, 2021 ) and STRING-db ( Szklarczyk et al, 2019 ), to add a more comprehensive characterization of our tear washes dataset. PIGNON was used to identify enriched biological processes via GO terms, while STRING-db was used to identity reactome pathways.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All this makes the DEg data difficult to integrate and interpret. The integration of differential gene expression profiles with functional enrichment analysis in protein interaction networks has been recently proposed to assist in the prioritization of disease-relevant targets [27] . In a similar argumentative line and to test the analytical procedure presented in this work, we next illustrate how the mapping of disease-related DEg profiles into BioInt libraries can improve the prioritization of potential functional targets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%