2016
DOI: 10.1080/10934529.2016.1159874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pilot aerobic membrane bioreactor and nanofiltration for municipal landfill leachate treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…50 RO and other membrane technologies should be applied for treating pretreated leachate that will reduce membrane fouling and maintain a reasonable water flux to reduce the energy requirement. 51 For instance, an anoxic/aerobic granular activated carbon assisted membrane bioreactor integrated with nanofiltration followed by RO was found to produce dischargeable effluent with no intense membrane fouling. 52 RO should be the last step after another membrane treatment (e.g., ultrafiltration, nanofiltration) to reduce membrane fouling.…”
Section: Advancement In Landfill Leachate Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…50 RO and other membrane technologies should be applied for treating pretreated leachate that will reduce membrane fouling and maintain a reasonable water flux to reduce the energy requirement. 51 For instance, an anoxic/aerobic granular activated carbon assisted membrane bioreactor integrated with nanofiltration followed by RO was found to produce dischargeable effluent with no intense membrane fouling. 52 RO should be the last step after another membrane treatment (e.g., ultrafiltration, nanofiltration) to reduce membrane fouling.…”
Section: Advancement In Landfill Leachate Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A pilot-scale three-stage disc tube RO achieved 92.4–99.2% COD and 46.2–95.8% ammonia rejection with >90% water recovery at a cost of $1.55–2.05 m –3 leachate treated that resulted in $1.18–1.56 kg –1 COD removed . RO and other membrane technologies should be applied for treating pre-treated leachate that will reduce membrane fouling and maintain a reasonable water flux to reduce the energy requirement . For instance, an anoxic/aerobic granular activated carbon assisted membrane bioreactor integrated with nanofiltration followed by RO was found to produce dischargeable effluent with no intense membrane fouling .…”
Section: Advancement In Landfill Leachate Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The start-up cost, which is the amount of capital required to start the operation, corresponding to 8% of fixed investment, was also considered as investment cost (Amaral et al, 2016).…”
Section: Cost Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to an estimate made by Samhaber and Nguyen (2014), the total cost of the industrial NF treatment process ranges from US$ 1 m −3 to US$ 6 m −3 . However, few studies mention the use of NF to treat landfill leachate (Amaral et al, 2016;Chaudhari and Murthy, 2010;De Almeida et al, 2019) and none of these studies have examined in detail the landfill leachate management costs. The costs for treatment of leachate vary from simpler processes such as co-treatment with sewage (about 18-27 € m −3 ) to more sophisticated technologies such as RO (15-40 € m −3 ) (De Almeida et al, 2019).…”
Section: Cost Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The start-up cost is the amount of capital required to start the operation, corresponding to 8% of direct capital cost (Amaral et al, 2016).…”
Section: (D) Start-upmentioning
confidence: 99%