2004
DOI: 10.1109/twc.2003.819022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pilot-Based Channel Estimation for OFDM Systems by Tracking the Delay-Subspace

Abstract: Abstract-In orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) systems over fast-varying fading channels, channel estimation and tracking is generally carried out by transmitting known pilot symbols in given positions of the frequency-time grid. The traditional approach consists of two steps. First, the least-squares (LS) estimate is obtained over the pilot subcarriers. Then, this preliminary estimate is interpolated/smoothed over the entire frequency-time grid. In this paper, we propose to add an intermediate … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
139
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
139
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…When the algorithm is tracking small changes in the STO (i.e., s = 1), only the cost functions of adjacent STO estimates are evaluated, so only 3(N cp +2) complex multiplications are performed. In the rare occurrence of large changes in STO, the algorithm can perform up to 3(3N cp ) = 9N cp complex multiplications since the sets of STO estimates As mentioned in [5], since the STO varies slowly with time, changes in the STO are somewhat rare events that occur on the order of hundreds of symbols, so the computational complexity of the proposed estimator is approximately a factor of 3(N cp +2) / 3(N+N cp ) = (N cp +2) / (N+N cp ) of the non-adaptive estimator. For the OFDM signal specifications given in Table I, this factor is (16+2) / (64+16) = 0.225 for IEEE 802.11a and (10+2) / (128+10) = 0.087 for the smallest bandwidth LTE signal.…”
Section: E Computational Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the algorithm is tracking small changes in the STO (i.e., s = 1), only the cost functions of adjacent STO estimates are evaluated, so only 3(N cp +2) complex multiplications are performed. In the rare occurrence of large changes in STO, the algorithm can perform up to 3(3N cp ) = 9N cp complex multiplications since the sets of STO estimates As mentioned in [5], since the STO varies slowly with time, changes in the STO are somewhat rare events that occur on the order of hundreds of symbols, so the computational complexity of the proposed estimator is approximately a factor of 3(N cp +2) / 3(N+N cp ) = (N cp +2) / (N+N cp ) of the non-adaptive estimator. For the OFDM signal specifications given in Table I, this factor is (16+2) / (64+16) = 0.225 for IEEE 802.11a and (10+2) / (128+10) = 0.087 for the smallest bandwidth LTE signal.…”
Section: E Computational Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differing from [8] is the incorporation of the new information into the matrix. In (13), we have used linear averaging, in which the effect of a new symbol decreases with time, as opposed to applying a constant weight to the new value as in [8].…”
Section: A Subspace Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (13), we have used linear averaging, in which the effect of a new symbol decreases with time, as opposed to applying a constant weight to the new value as in [8]. The reason for this, is that in a multi-user environment, the allocation scheme changes very rapidly, and hence the entire duration of the algorithm is several tens of OFDM symbols.…”
Section: A Subspace Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The outputs of DACs are passed through a serial -parallel module prior to removing the CP. Owing to the CP, the linear convolution between the transmitted signal and the channel becomes a circular convolution; hence, the output of the FFT can be written as a product in the matrix form given by [21] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%