2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.06.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pilot-scale evaluation of FO-RO osmotic dilution process for treating wastewater from coal-fired power plant integrated with seawater desalination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Salehi's study [45], zeolite nanoparticles were blended into polyethersulfone (PES) support layer and the water flux of the resulting membrane was 43% higher than the control TFC membrane (1.93 L/m 2 h bar) with salt rejection recorded at 94.7%. Many other nanomaterials have also been used in blending methods to modify FO membranes, such as graphene oxide (GO), carbon nanotube [46], titanium dioxide [47], and silica [35]. These studies confirmed that physical modification can effectively improve hydrophilicity and porosity of membrane which leads to higher water flux without reducing rejection.…”
Section: Modifications On Fo Membranesmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Salehi's study [45], zeolite nanoparticles were blended into polyethersulfone (PES) support layer and the water flux of the resulting membrane was 43% higher than the control TFC membrane (1.93 L/m 2 h bar) with salt rejection recorded at 94.7%. Many other nanomaterials have also been used in blending methods to modify FO membranes, such as graphene oxide (GO), carbon nanotube [46], titanium dioxide [47], and silica [35]. These studies confirmed that physical modification can effectively improve hydrophilicity and porosity of membrane which leads to higher water flux without reducing rejection.…”
Section: Modifications On Fo Membranesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The diluted DS was dewatered through NF with a NaCl rejection of 98.5%. In the FO + RO hybrid process for coal-fired power plant wastewater treatment and reuse, seawater after UF was used as DS [46]. The average water flux of the pilot FO process was 10.6 ± 0.1 LMH during the summer which was 30% greater than that during winter.…”
Section: Fo and Fo-based Hybrid Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A pilot plant consists of integrated FO-RO utilizing wastewater from coal-fired power plant as feed solution to dilute the seawater (draw solution) has been conducted by Choi et al (2017) for 5 months of operation period [17]. The energy consumption analysis revealed that the energy consumption for desalinating the diluted seawater by FO was 23.3% less than a typical seawater desalination by RO, with specific energy consumption (SEC) for the integrated FO-RO at 2.85±0.05 kWh/m 3 and seawater RO at 3.34±0.05 kWh/m 3 .…”
Section: Fig 2 Integrated Fo-ro Process For Seawater Desalinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, people may even prefer lower-quality water from a source perceived as "natural" over higher-quality water coming from an advanced wastewater treatment facility. Reclaimed water's history as wastewater causes a psychological barrier for many people that can be hard to overcome [11,[56][57][58][59][60].…”
Section: Public Preferences and Acceptabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%