2020
DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.23737.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pilot study for the evaluation and adaptation of a Four Item-Acne-Scar Risk Assessment Tool (4-ASRAT): a resource to estimate the risk of acne-induced scars

Abstract: Background: Acne-induced scarring is associated with a similar burden as acne, i.e. diminished quality of life, and may be avoided if patients receive appropriate and timely acne treatment. In 2017, a four item-Acne-Scar Risk Assessment Tool (4-ASRAT) was designed by Tan et al. to categorise patients with acne into lower-risk or higher-risk for acne scarring. Its applicability outside the initial study population (France, Brazil and United States) remains to be determined.  Methods: A study protocol was develo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A risk assessment tool for acne scarring is under development by another group, which could help alert patients to the risk of scar development and has the potential to be a valuable public health measure, given the considerable associated morbidity. 33 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A risk assessment tool for acne scarring is under development by another group, which could help alert patients to the risk of scar development and has the potential to be a valuable public health measure, given the considerable associated morbidity. 33 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once enrolled in the study, participants completed a survey that was developed based on the seventeen risk factors identified by Tan et al [ 7 ] and included questions addressing potential risk factors specific to the Ecuadorian population as determined by means of a Delphi expert consensus consulting registered Ecuadorian dermatologists. Each participant entered the photobooth and had three facial photographs taken following the standards stated in the pilot study publication [ 8 ]. The photographs of each participant were evaluated by three dermatologists who fulfilled a set of inclusion and exclusion criteria to participate in the study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the most relevant inclusion criteria for the reviewing dermatologists were that they had practiced dermatology for more than five years, that they had seen more than 35 patients with acne in the last year, and that they had at least one publication related to acne in a scientific journal. More details about the methods can be found in the publication of the pilot study that has been previously published [ 8 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations