2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.04.123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pilot Study of Neurologic Pupil Index as A Predictor of External Ventricular Drain Clamp Trial Failure After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This extends our previous knowledge of NPi, which showed that abnormal NPi upon admission for TBI was predictive of an adverse patient outcome (Riker et al, 2020). The results also extend the recent findings of El Ahmadieh et al ( 2021) and Kamal et al (2022), who report that an abnormal NPi finding using QP has high specificity for surgical decision making.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This extends our previous knowledge of NPi, which showed that abnormal NPi upon admission for TBI was predictive of an adverse patient outcome (Riker et al, 2020). The results also extend the recent findings of El Ahmadieh et al ( 2021) and Kamal et al (2022), who report that an abnormal NPi finding using QP has high specificity for surgical decision making.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…It is important to emphasize that the decision of whether to insert a VPS is usually based on the neurological condition and a computed tomography scan of the brain, and no standardized measurements exist to accurately predict when a VPS is required. However, multiple factors apart from the weaning strategy might affect the success of the weaning attempt, such as age, daily EVD output, the severity of the hemorrhage, and the amount of previous wean failures [ 22 , 23 ]. These factors are not or inconsistently reported in the literature of this meta-analysis and may have influenced the decision of which weaning method was chosen in the retrospective studies, which may contain a potential bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%