2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00455-020-10123-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pilot Study of Quantitative Methods for Differentiating Pharyngeal Swallowing Mechanics by Dysphagia Etiology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have reported different phenotypes of altered swallowing mechanics according to disease classifications using FEES, multivariate shape change analysis based on VFSS, and electrokinesiographic studies that recorded the surface electromyographic activities (sEMG) of SHM/submental muscle complex. 1 , 30 , 34 , 38 These distinct features of dysphagia phenotype might have been documented in the significantly different SHM ratio, peak-to-peak time and total duration according to the disease classifications in our study. Increased peak-to-peak time and total duration were more pronounced in patients with ALS and peripheral NM, whereas a reduced SHM ratio was predominant in patients with stroke.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Previous studies have reported different phenotypes of altered swallowing mechanics according to disease classifications using FEES, multivariate shape change analysis based on VFSS, and electrokinesiographic studies that recorded the surface electromyographic activities (sEMG) of SHM/submental muscle complex. 1 , 30 , 34 , 38 These distinct features of dysphagia phenotype might have been documented in the significantly different SHM ratio, peak-to-peak time and total duration according to the disease classifications in our study. Increased peak-to-peak time and total duration were more pronounced in patients with ALS and peripheral NM, whereas a reduced SHM ratio was predominant in patients with stroke.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%