The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of CRP/Albumin, ESR/Albumin Ratio, ESR, CRP and albumin to differentiate bone and soft tissue infection in persons with diabetes. We retrospectively evaluated 242 individuals admitted to hospital with diabetes‐related foot infections (DFI). We categorized DFI cases as either bone (OM) or soft tissue infection (STI) based on bone culture and/or histology. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of CRP, ESR, Albumin, CRP/Albumin and ESR/Albumin as biomarkers to diagnose OM in persons with diabetes. The median age was 53 years (74% male). There were 224 diabetes‐related patients of which 125 had been diagnosed with osteomyelitis. The ESR/Albumin and CRP/Albumin ratios cut‐points were > 17.84 and > 1.83, respectively. ESR/Albumin and CRP/Albumin ratios had similar diagnostic parameters: AUC (0.71, 0.71), sensitivity (70.0%, 57.0%), specificity (62.0%, 75.0%), positive predictive value (67.0%, 71.0%) and negative predictive value (66.0% and 71.0%). In contrast diagnostic efficiency of CRP and ESR were AUC 0.71 and 0.71, sensitivity (45.6%, 71.2%), specificity (85.5%, 60.7%), positive predictive value (70.0%, 65.9%), and negative predictive value (59.5%, 66.4%), respectively. When comparing area under the curves, the results showed that ESR/Albumin was not significantly different to ESR alone (Delong test p vs ESR > 0.1). Similarly, CRP/Albumin was not significantly different to CRP alone (Delong test p vs CRP > 0.1). In conclusion, ESR/Albumin and CRP/Albumin ratios provided comparable results as using ESR and CRP alone.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.