2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-020-06663-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pilot Validation of a New Wireless Patch System as an Ambulatory, Noninvasive Tool That Measures Gut Myoelectrical Signals: Physiologic and Disease Correlations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another major difference is that the stomach normally has a single dominant pacemaker, but the colon has multiple independent and simultaneously active regions. While others have reported a colonic frequency range measured on the body surface of 12–20 cpm 50 , 51 , we have only observed frequencies up to a maximum of about 12 cpm from HRCM analysis, which is in keeping with the majority of manometry studies 31 , 33 , 34 , 52 . Also, our data clearly show that the observed frequency range from the body surface is not always directly congruent with actual colonic frequency range (due to summation effects), yet it still remains below 12 cpm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Another major difference is that the stomach normally has a single dominant pacemaker, but the colon has multiple independent and simultaneously active regions. While others have reported a colonic frequency range measured on the body surface of 12–20 cpm 50 , 51 , we have only observed frequencies up to a maximum of about 12 cpm from HRCM analysis, which is in keeping with the majority of manometry studies 31 , 33 , 34 , 52 . Also, our data clearly show that the observed frequency range from the body surface is not always directly congruent with actual colonic frequency range (due to summation effects), yet it still remains below 12 cpm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Another major difference is that the stomach normally has a single dominant pacemaker, but the colon has multiple independent and simultaneously active regions. While others have reported a colonic frequency range measured on the body surface of 12 to 20 cpm 50,51 , we have only observed frequencies up to a maximum of about 12 cpm from HRCM analysis, which is in keeping with the large majority of manometry studies 31,33,34,52 . Also, our data clearly show that the observed frequency range from the body surface is not always directly congruent with actual colonic frequency range (due to summation effects), yet it still remains below 12 cpm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Furthermore, repeatability of sEEnG measurements has not been determined appropriately before. In 2020, Axelrod et al demonstrated that the dominant frequency and signal intensity of sEEnG were constant over a period of three years, but they only demonstrated this graphically [ 20 ]. The results of the current study provide new insights in the use of ultrasound to guide sEEnG electrode positioning as well as the repeatability of the sEEnG measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%