2009
DOI: 10.1080/15245000902989121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Piloting EX, a Social Marketing Campaign to Prompt Smoking Cessation

Abstract: This article focuses on the development, implementation, and evaluation of a branded smoking cessation campaign piloted in four cities in the United States. The development of the EX brand and messaging strategies were based on existing public health literature and extensive formative research. Market segmentation was specifically employed to create messages that would resonate with a defined target audience, smokers who were thinking about quitting smoking. This approach led to the creation of a campaign with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…25,26 Therefore, EX is considered a cost-effective intervention. A subgroup analysis in young adult smokers ages [18][19][20][21][22][23][24] showed that EX was also cost-effective in this population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…25,26 Therefore, EX is considered a cost-effective intervention. A subgroup analysis in young adult smokers ages [18][19][20][21][22][23][24] showed that EX was also cost-effective in this population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Confirmed awareness was assessed by asking respondents if they had "recently seen an ad on TV," followed by a brief description of the beginning of an EX advertisement. Respondents were then asked to describe additional details about that advertisement.…”
Section: Study Data and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of the 17 studies included, 10 were conducted in the USA [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34], five in Australia [35][36][37][38][39], and two in New Zealand [40,41]. The primary marker of disadvantage was ethnicity, reported in 10 papers [24,25,[27][28][29][32][33][34][35][39][40][41]. Ethnic groups included African Americans, Hispanic Americans,Vietnamese Americans, Australian Aboriginals and New Zealand Māori.…”
Section: Description Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the literature provides examples of both quantitative and qualitative methods for formative selection and pretesting of messages, qualitative methods such as focus groups and in-depth interviews seem to dominate antismoking evaluations (e.g., Bradley, Thorson, Bothner, & Allen, 2000; McCausland et al, 2009). Focus groups have utility because they allow for open discussion of ideas, increasing the possibility of discovering new information related to the outcome of interest that investigators might not have otherwise considered (Hull, Gasiorowicz, Hollander, & Short, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%