2015
DOI: 10.1090/jams829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pin(2)-Equivariant Seiberg-Witten Floer homology and the Triangulation Conjecture

Abstract: Abstract. We define Pin(2)-equivariant Seiberg-Witten Floer homology for rational homology 3-spheres equipped with a spin structure. The analogue of Frøyshov's correction term in this setting is an integer-valued invariant of homology cobordism whose mod 2 reduction is the Rokhlin invariant. As an application, we show that there are no homology 3-spheres Y of Rokhlin invariant one such that Y #Y bounds an acyclic smooth 4-manifold. By previous work of Galewski-Stern and Matumoto, this implies the existence of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
237
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(241 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(168 reference statements)
4
237
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let G= Pin (2) be the group consisting of two copies of the complex unit circle, along with a map j interchanging them, so that ij=ji and j2=1. In , Manolescu associated to a spin three‐manifold (Y,s) the G‐equivariant Seiberg–Witten Floer homology italicSWFHGfalse(Y,fraktursfalse), which is the Borel homology of a stable homotopy type SWF(Y,s). From its module structure, he defined homology cobordism invariants α,β,γ as analogues of the Frøyshov invariant of the usual, S1‐equivariant, Seiberg–Witten Floer homology .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let G= Pin (2) be the group consisting of two copies of the complex unit circle, along with a map j interchanging them, so that ij=ji and j2=1. In , Manolescu associated to a spin three‐manifold (Y,s) the G‐equivariant Seiberg–Witten Floer homology italicSWFHGfalse(Y,fraktursfalse), which is the Borel homology of a stable homotopy type SWF(Y,s). From its module structure, he defined homology cobordism invariants α,β,γ as analogues of the Frøyshov invariant of the usual, S1‐equivariant, Seiberg–Witten Floer homology .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where η I µ , complexified four-vectors, which take the following form: 25) and τ = C 0 + ie −φ denotes the complexified string coupling of Type IIB string theory. This structure results in the discrete gauge invariance of the effective four-dimensional action, which corresponds to the Heisenberg discrete symmetry specified by k 1 , k 2 , k 3 and M .…”
Section: Jhep07(2017)129mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For higher dimensions including the 4-dimensional spacetime, a triangulation does not necessarily exist and if it exists it is not guaranteed to be unique or to correspond to a single space [90][91][92][93].…”
Section: Chaptermentioning
confidence: 99%