1918
DOI: 10.1086/332365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pine Needles, Their Significance and History

Abstract: Are pine needles shoots or leaves.? The question may still be debated, since neither the shoot nor the leaf has as yet been clearly defined. A review of the morphology, development, and physiology of the "needles" may be of interest.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, infiltration processes are expected to change with litter composition, as was found by sprinkler experiments (Guevara‐Escobar et al, ). This could have allowed the litter to retain more water in some instances (perhaps due to water pooling in the proximal area of pine cones' ovuliferous scales) and less water in other cases (perhaps water drains more rapidly along the hydrophobic cutin layers of a needleaf‐dominated litter: Dufrenoy, ; Hansel, Aoki, Maia, Cunha, & Dedecek, ). Canopy traits controlling receipt of radiation were also held constant, yet the LAI and fraction of canopy gap ( F o ) will change with phenological shifts in P. elliottii stands (Gholz & Clark, ; Gholz et al, ) and, likely, after meteorological disturbance due to downed branches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, infiltration processes are expected to change with litter composition, as was found by sprinkler experiments (Guevara‐Escobar et al, ). This could have allowed the litter to retain more water in some instances (perhaps due to water pooling in the proximal area of pine cones' ovuliferous scales) and less water in other cases (perhaps water drains more rapidly along the hydrophobic cutin layers of a needleaf‐dominated litter: Dufrenoy, ; Hansel, Aoki, Maia, Cunha, & Dedecek, ). Canopy traits controlling receipt of radiation were also held constant, yet the LAI and fraction of canopy gap ( F o ) will change with phenological shifts in P. elliottii stands (Gholz & Clark, ; Gholz et al, ) and, likely, after meteorological disturbance due to downed branches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%