1987
DOI: 10.1002/sce.3730710413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pinholes and images: Children's conceptions of light and vision. I

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0
13

Year Published

1988
1988
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
43
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…This interaction often leads to the construction of new representations, which are again incompatible with scientific concepts and which are constructed by pupils through teaching. In searching for the interpretations that these new representations lead to, as these are documented in the relevant literature and confirmed by our own preliminary research (pre-test), we discover that pupils' interpretative schemata are largely dependent on the way in which children perceive light emission when coming from extended light sources (Galili 1996;Galili et al 1993;Goldberg and McDermott 1987;Fawaz and Viennot 1986;Rice and Feher 1987). After codifying the pupils' alternative approaches, three representation categories emerge:…”
Section: Light Emission By Extended Light Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…This interaction often leads to the construction of new representations, which are again incompatible with scientific concepts and which are constructed by pupils through teaching. In searching for the interpretations that these new representations lead to, as these are documented in the relevant literature and confirmed by our own preliminary research (pre-test), we discover that pupils' interpretative schemata are largely dependent on the way in which children perceive light emission when coming from extended light sources (Galili 1996;Galili et al 1993;Goldberg and McDermott 1987;Fawaz and Viennot 1986;Rice and Feher 1987). After codifying the pupils' alternative approaches, three representation categories emerge:…”
Section: Light Emission By Extended Light Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The lines used to depict light in diagrams of 12-16 year olds are sometimes misleading. Radial lines emanating from a source have a preferential direction towards the opening and seem to be deflected by openings instead of crossing each other or they emanate in a parallel or diverging fashion and bend through the gap (Feher and Rice 1988;Rice and Feher 1987;La Rosa et al 1984;Galili and Hazan 2000b). Some 16 and 17 year old students view rays as actual constituents of light and understand the brightness of a source as a measure of the number of rays emitted, or they believe that the strength of a ray attenuates with distance (Galili and Lavrik 1998;Galili and Hazan 2000b;Hubber 2006).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…They believe that light is emitted from a source in all directions but with just one ray leaving from each point of the surface (Galili and Hazan 2000b;Rice and Feher 1987;Bendall et al 1993). This misconception lies behind the difficulty students have to explain properly the shadows, the pinhole images, and the image formation by reflection on a mirror (Feher and Rice 1988;Rice and Feher 1987;Bendall et al 1993). With respect to the latter, the lines they draw to connect the object to its image do not represent light but suggest a holistic way of thinking about image creation .…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A significant body of such studies documented learners" alternative conceptions about plane mirror reflection (Eshach 2010;Lawson 2010). Some studies reported learners" alternative ideas on light and vision (Rice & Feher 1987;Selley 1996) while others dealt with shadows (Chen 2009). Evidence of research done on learners" ideas about refraction was also found (Kaewkhong et al 2008(Kaewkhong et al , 2010Sengoren 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%