2005
DOI: 10.1063/1.2144457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pinning in nomagnetic borocarbides

Abstract: ͑͒The field dependences of the Labush parameter in nonmagnetic borocarbides are measured by a method that does not require achieving a critical state. The expected values of the critical current are estimated. The values obtained are two orders of magnitude greater than the results of "direct" measurements performed on the basis of transport ͑magnetic͒ experiments. A giant peak effect, which the collective pinning model describes quantitatively well, is observed in the field dependences of the Labush parameter… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that the coefficient α M obtained is in two orders of magnitude smaller than η (Ref. [10]) at the same H. It is interesting to compare the value of the Hall coefficient R H = Ωτ /(σ 0 H) that follows from our experimental data with the results obtained by the transport measurements. For the Y-based compounds at H = 4 T and T = 5 K we have R H ≈ 2.8•10 −12 Ω•cm•Oe −1 that almost coincides with the results of Ref.…”
supporting
confidence: 46%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We note that the coefficient α M obtained is in two orders of magnitude smaller than η (Ref. [10]) at the same H. It is interesting to compare the value of the Hall coefficient R H = Ωτ /(σ 0 H) that follows from our experimental data with the results obtained by the transport measurements. For the Y-based compounds at H = 4 T and T = 5 K we have R H ≈ 2.8•10 −12 Ω•cm•Oe −1 that almost coincides with the results of Ref.…”
supporting
confidence: 46%
“…We note that the coefficient α M is by two orders of magnitude smaller than η (ref. [10]) at the same H.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%