2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.129.132001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pion and Kaon Distribution Amplitudes from Lattice QCD

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We see that (a) the scale running of the nonperturbative parameters does not bring significant modification to the fit result, indicating that fixing them at the default scale in previous pQCD calculations is a reasonable treatment, (b) the variation of scale choice brings about 20%-30% modification to the result of m π 0 , which reveals the possible nonnegligible correction from the next-to-next-leading-order QCD correction to the form factor, (c) the fitted result of m π 0 is well under control with the current data accuracy, and the data-driven approach developed here to extract the nonper- The data-driven approach developed here can not extract the gegenbauer coefficient a π 2 in the study of pion electromagnetic form factor. From the theoretical side, the first lattice endeavour by using the momentum smearing technique shows a π 2 (1 GeV) = 0.155 +0.025 −0.027 with full control of all systematic errors [40], while the very recent lattice result by using large-momentum effective theory shows a noticeably larger value 0.258 +0.070 −0.052 [41]. It is also studied by the global PQCD fit at leading order (LO) with considering the wellexplained hadronic two-body B decays [42], nevertheless, the result shows obvious difference with that obtained from QCD sum rules (QCDSRs) [34], dispersion derivation [43] and LQCD evaluations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We see that (a) the scale running of the nonperturbative parameters does not bring significant modification to the fit result, indicating that fixing them at the default scale in previous pQCD calculations is a reasonable treatment, (b) the variation of scale choice brings about 20%-30% modification to the result of m π 0 , which reveals the possible nonnegligible correction from the next-to-next-leading-order QCD correction to the form factor, (c) the fitted result of m π 0 is well under control with the current data accuracy, and the data-driven approach developed here to extract the nonper- The data-driven approach developed here can not extract the gegenbauer coefficient a π 2 in the study of pion electromagnetic form factor. From the theoretical side, the first lattice endeavour by using the momentum smearing technique shows a π 2 (1 GeV) = 0.155 +0.025 −0.027 with full control of all systematic errors [40], while the very recent lattice result by using large-momentum effective theory shows a noticeably larger value 0.258 +0.070 −0.052 [41]. It is also studied by the global PQCD fit at leading order (LO) with considering the wellexplained hadronic two-body B decays [42], nevertheless, the result shows obvious difference with that obtained from QCD sum rules (QCDSRs) [34], dispersion derivation [43] and LQCD evaluations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21] and figure 1 of ref. [25] that the continuum perturbation theory can describe lattice matrix element around 0.1 − 0.2 fm. This value is much smaller than the proton charge radius around 0.8 fm where the non-perturbative effects are important.…”
Section: Jhep12(2023)044mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[22]. It has a wide range of applications [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] since its proposal.…”
Section: Jhep12(2023)044mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The input parameters adopted in our numerical calculations are summarized as follows (the masses, decay constants, and QCD scale are in units of GeV, and the meson lifetime is in units of ps) [31,43,48]:…”
Section: B Cmentioning
confidence: 99%