Pion femtoscopy in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>collisions at<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><

Aggarwal, M. M.; Ahammed, Z.; Alakhverdyants, A. V.; Alekseev, I.; Alford, J.; Anderson, B. D.; Arkhipkin, D.; Averichev, G. S.; Balewski, J.; Barnby, L. S.; Baumgart, Stephen; Beavis, D.; Bellwied, R.; Betancourt, M.; Betts, R. R.; Bhasin, A.; Bhati, A. K.; Bichsel, H.; Bielčík, J.; Bielčíková, J.; Biritz, B.; Bland, L. C.; Bonner, B. E.; Bouchet, J.; Braidot, E.; Brandin, A. V.; Bridgeman, A.; Bruna, E.; Bueltmann, S.; Bunzarov, I.; Burton, T. P.; Cai, X. Z.; Caines, H.; Sanchez, M. C.; Catu, O.; Cebra, D.; Cendejas, R.; Cervantes, M. C.; Chajęcki, Z.; Chaloupka, P.; Chattopadhyay, S.; Chen, H. F.; Chen, J. H.; Chen, J. Y.; Cheng, J.; Cherney, M.; Chikanian, A.; Choi, K.; Christie, W.; Chung, P.; Clarke, R. F.; Codrington, M. J. M.; Corliss, R.; Cramer, J. G.; Crawford, H. J.; Das, D.; Dash, S.; Leyva, A. Davila; Silva, L. C. De; Debbe, R.; Dedovich, T. G.; Derevschikov, A. A.; Souza, R. Derradi de; Didenko, L.; Djawotho, P.; Dogra, S.; Dong, X.; Drachenberg, J. L.; Draper, J. E.; Dunlop, J. C.; Mazumdar, M. R. Dutta; Efimov, L. G.; Elhalhuli, E.; Elnimr, M.; Engelage, J.; Eppley, G.; Erazmus, B.; Estienne, M.; Eun, L.; Evdokimov, O.; Fachini, P.; Fatemi, R.; Fedorišin, J.; Fersch, R. G.; Filip, P.; Finch, E.; Fine, V.; Fisyak, Y.; Gagliardi, C. A.; Gangadharan, D. R.; Ganti, M. S.; García-Solis, E.; Geromitsos, A.; Geurts, F. J. M.; Ghazikhanian, V.; Ghosh, P.; Gorbunov, Y. N.; Gordon, A.; Grebenyuk, O. G.; Grosnick, D.; Guertin, S. M.; Gupta, A.; Gupta, N.; Guryn, W.; Haag, B.; Hamed, A.; Han, L.; Harris, J. W.; Hays-Wehle, J. P.; Heinz, M.; Heppelmann, S.; Hirsch, A.; Hjort, E.; Hoffman, A. M.; Hoffmann, G. W.; Hofman, D. J.; Huang, B.; Huang, H. Z.; Humanic, T. J.; Huo, L.; Igo, G.; Jacobs, P.; Jacobs, W. W.; Jena, C.; Jin, F.; Jones, C. L.; Jones, P. G.; Joseph, J.; Judd, E. G.; Kabana, S.; Kajimoto, K.; Kang, K.; Kapitan, J.; Kauder, K.; Keane, D.; Kechechyan, A.; Kettler, David; Kikoła, D. P.; Kiryluk, J.; Kisiel, A.; Klein, S. R.; Knospe, A. G.; Kocoloski, A.; Koetke, D. D.; Kollegger, T.; Konzer, J.; Koralt, I.; Koroleva, L. I.; Korsch, W.; Kotchenda, L.; Kouchpil, V.; Кравцов, П.; Krueger, K.; Krůs, M.; Kumar, L.; Kurnadi, P.; Lamont, M. A.C.; Landgraf, J. M.; LaPointe, S.; Lauret, J.; Lebedev, A.; Lednický, R.; Lee, C. H.; Lee, J. H.; Leight, W. A.; LeVine, M. J.; Li, C.; Li, L.; Li, N.; Li, W.; Li, X.; Li, Y.; Li, Z. M.; Lin, G.; Lindenbaum, S. J.; Lisa, M. A.; Liu, F.; Liu, H.; Liu, J.; Ljubičić, T.; Llope, W. J.; Longacre, R. S.; Love, W. A.; Lu, Y.; Lukashov, E. V.; Luo, X.; L., G.; G., Y.; Mahapatra, D. P.; Majka, R.; Mall, O.; Mangotra, L. K.; Manweiler, R.; Margetis, S.; Markert, C.; Masui, H.; Matis, H. S.; Matulenko, Yu. A.; McDonald, D.; McShane, T. S.; Meschanin, A.; Milner, R.; Minaev, N. G.; Mioduszewski, S.; Mischke, A.; Mitrovski, M.; Mohanty, B.; Mondal, M. M.; Morozov, B.; Морозов, Д. А.; Munhoz, M. G.; Nandi, B. K.; Nattrass, C.; Nayak, T. K.; Nelson, J. M.; Netrakanti, P. K.; Ng, M. J.; Nogach, L. V.; Nurushev, S. B.; Odyniec, G.; Ogawa, A.; Okorokov, V.; Oldag, E. W.; Olson, D.; Pachr, M.; Page, B. S.; Pal, S. K.; Pandit, Y.; Panebratsev, Y.; Pawlak, T.; Peitzmann, T.; Perevoztchikov, V.; Perkins, C.; Peryt, W.; Phatak, S. C.; Pile, P.; Planinić, M.; Płoskoń, M.; Pluta, J.; Plyku, D.; Poljak, N.; Poskanzer, A. M.; Potukuchi, B.; Powell, C. B.; Prindle, D.; Pruneau, C.; Pruthi, N. K.; Pujahari, P. R.; Putschke, J.; Qiu, H.; Raniwala, R.; Raniwala, S.; Ray, R. L.; Redwine, R.; Reed, R.; Ritter, H. G.; Roberts, J.; Rogachevskiy, O. V.; Romero, J. L.; Rose, A.; Roy, C.; Ruan, L.; Sahoo, R.; Sakai, S.; Sakrejda, I.; Sakuma, T.; Salur, S.; Sandweiss, J.; Sangaline, E.; Schambach, J.; Scharenberg, R. P.; Schmitz, N.; Schuster, T.; Seele, J.; Seger, J.; Selyuzhenkov, I.; Seyboth, P.; Shahaliev, E.; Shao, M.; Sharma, Meenakshi; Shi, S. S.; Sichtermann, E. P.; Simon, F.; Singaraju, R.; Skoby, M. J.; Smirnov, N.; Sorensen, P.; Sowiński, J.; Spinka, H. M.; Srivastava, B.; Stanislaus, T. D. S.; Staszak, D.; Stevens, J. R.; Stock, R.; Strikhanov, M.; Stringfellow, B.; Suaide, Alexandre Alarcon Do Passo; Suarez, M. C.; Subba, N. L.; Šumbera, M.; Sun, X. M.; Sun, Y. J.; Sun, Z.; Surrow, B.; Svirida, D. N.; Symons, T. J. M.; Toledo, A. Szanto de; Takahashi, J.; Tang, A. H.; Tang, Z.; Tarini, L. H.; Tarnowsky, T.; Thein, D.; Thomas, J. H.; Tian, J.; Timmins, A. R.; Timoshenko, S.; Tlusty, D.; Tokarev, M.; Trainor, T. A.; Tram, V. N.; Trentalange, S.; Tribble, R. E.; Tsai, O. D.; Ulery, J.; Ullrich, T.; Underwood, D. G.; Buren, G. Van; Leeuwen, M. van; Nieuwenhuizen, G. van; Vanfossen, J. A.; Varma, R.; Vasconcelos, G. M.S.; Vasiliev, A.; Videbæk, F.; Viyogi, Y. P.; Vokál, S.; Voloshin, S. A.; Wada, M.; Walker, M.; Wang, F.; Wang, G.; Wang, H.; Wang, J. S.; Wang, Q.; Wang, X. L.; Wang, Y.; Webb, G.; Webb, J. C.; Westfall, G. D.; Whitten, C.; Wieman, H.; Wissink, S. W.; Witt, R.; Wu, Y.; Xie, W.; Xu, H.; Xu, N.; Xu, Q. H.; Xu, W.; Xu, Y.; Xu, Z.; Xue, L.; Yang, Y.; Yepes, P.; Yip, K.; Yoo, I. K.; Yue, Q.; Zawisza, M.; Zbroszczyk, H.; Zhan, W.; Zhang, J. B.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, W. M.; Zhang, X. P.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Z. P.; Zhao, J.; Chen, Zhong; Zhou, Jing; Zhou, Wei; Zhu, X.; Zhu, Y.; Zoulkarneev, R.; Zoulkarneeva, Y.

doi:10.1103/physrevc.83.064905

Cited by 55 publications

(48 citation statements)

References 85 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Each point corresponds to a fit of hadron yields in central Au-Au or Pb-Pb collisions at a given collision energy. The agreement between the results from several independent analyses [29,32,33,34] is very good. Note that in some cases [32,33,34] an additional fit parameter, the strangeness suppression factor γ s , is used to test possible departure from equilibrium of hadrons containing strange quark(s).…”

Section: Chemical Freeze-out Of Light-quark Hadronssupporting

confidence: 52%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Hadron yields, the chemical freeze-out and the QCD phase diagram

Andronic

Braun‐Munzinger

Redlich

et al. 2017

J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Chemical Freeze-out Of Light-quark Hadronssupporting

confidence: 52%

“…Figure 4. The phase diagram of strongly interacting matter with the points representing the thermal fits of hadron yields at various collision energies [14,29,32,33,34]. The crossover T values from lattice QCD [35,36] are shown as bands at small µ B values.…”

Section: Chemical Freeze-out Of Light-quark Hadronsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hadron yields, the chemical freeze-out and the QCD phase diagram

Andronic

Braun‐Munzinger

Redlich

et al. 2017

J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The models based on the CGC formalism suggest sizes similar to those obtained in pp data. The observed differences of about 10%-20% for high-multiplicity p-Pb , as a function of the measured charged-particle multiplicity density, measured for various collision systems and energies by CERES [42], STAR [45,46,53], PHENIX [54], and ALICE [16].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 88%

Two-pion femtoscopy inp-Pb collisions atsNN=5.02TeV

Adam¹,

Adamová²,

Aggarwal³

et al. 2015

Phys. Rev. C

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We report the results of the femtoscopic analysis of pairs of identical pions measured in p-Pb collisions at √ s NN = 5.02 TeV. Femtoscopic radii are determined as a function of event multiplicity and pair momentum in three spatial dimensions. As in the pp collision system, the analysis is complicated by the presence of sizable background correlation structures in addition to the femtoscopic signal. The radii increase with event multiplicity and decrease with pair transverse momentum. When taken at comparable multiplicity, the radii measured in p-Pb collisions, at high multiplicity and low pair transverse momentum, are 10%-20% higher than those observed in pp collisions but below those observed in A-A collisions. The results are compared to hydrodynamic predictions at large event multiplicity as well as discussed in the context of calculations based on gluon saturation.

show abstract

“…But overviews [3,4,9] of femtoscopic measurements in hadron-and lepton-induced collisions reveal systematics surprisingly similar to those mentioned above for heavyion collisions. Moreover, in the first direct comparison of femtoscopy in heavy-ion collisions at Relativistic HeavyIon Collider (RHIC) and proton collisions in the same apparatus an essentially identical multiplicity-and momentum dependence was reported in the two systems [10]. However, the multiplicities at which the femtoscopic measurement in pp collisions at RHIC was made were still significantly smaller than those in even the most peripheral heavy-ion collisions.…”

Section: Proton-proton Collisions Atmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…All points at given k T bin should be at the same value of k T , but we shifted them to improve visibility. Open black squares show values for pp collisions at ffiffi ffi s p ¼ 200 GeV from STAR [10]. Lines connecting the points for lowest and highest multiplicity range were added to highlight the trends.…”

Section: Fig 11 (Color Online) Parameters Of the Three-dimensionalmentioning

confidence: 99%

Femtoscopy ofppcollisions ats=0.9and 7 TeV at the LHC with two-pion Bose-Einstein correlations

Aamodt¹,

Quintana²,

Adamová³

et al. 2011

Phys. Rev. D

Self Cite

113

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We report on the high statistics two-pion correlation functions from pp collisions at ffiffi ffi s p ¼ 0:9 TeV and ffiffi ffi s p ¼ 7 TeV, measured by the ALICE experiment at the Large Hadron Collider. The correlation functions as well as the extracted source radii scale with event multiplicity and pair momentum. When analyzed in the same multiplicity and pair transverse momentum range, the correlation is similar at the two collision energies. A three-dimensional femtoscopic analysis shows an increase of the emission zone with increasing event multiplicity as well as decreasing homogeneity lengths with increasing transverse momentum. The latter trend gets more pronounced as multiplicity increases. This suggests the development of space-momentum correlations, at least for collisions producing a high multiplicity of particles. We consider these trends in the context of previous femtoscopic studies in high-energy hadron and heavyion collisions and discuss possible underlying physics mechanisms. Detailed analysis of the correlation reveals an exponential shape in the outward and longitudinal directions, while the sideward remains a Gaussian. This is interpreted as a result of a significant contribution of strongly decaying resonances to the emission region shape. Significant nonfemtoscopic correlations are observed, and are argued to be the consequence of ''mini-jet''-like structures extending to low p t . They are well reproduced by the MonteCarlo generators and seen also in þ À correlations.

show abstract

Pion femtoscopy inp + pcollisions at<

Cited by 55 publications

References 85 publications

Hadron yields, the chemical freeze-out and the QCD phase diagram

Hadron yields, the chemical freeze-out and the QCD phase diagram

Two-pion femtoscopy inp-Pb collisions atsNN=5.02TeV

Femtoscopy ofppcollisions ats=0.9and 7 TeV at the LHC with two-pion Bose-Einstein correlations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About