1993
DOI: 10.1088/0031-8949/48/2/016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pion production near absolute threshold, narrow resonances in (p, π) reaction and localized Δ-isobar states in nuclei

Abstract: The experimental data analysis we have carried out shows that there are at the least two additional experimental dataOf which the hypothesis Of the A-isobar localized state (A-ball) formation can be used. Possible mechanism of A-isobar localized state formation in nuclear reaction is considered. A set of main A-isobar localized state characteristics is obtained and the model of II, y-production in pnucleus and nucleus-for the nucleus collisions through A-localized state formation is suggested. The First, it is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Probably, one of these states was observed by the CHAOS Collaboration at TRIUMF, which measured the enhancement of the two-pion invariant mass spectrum near threshold only for rather heavy nuclei [15]. The model of a localized state of the ∆ isobar in nuclear matter [16], so-called "delta ball," could explain the value of the cross section and the small width of the corresponding resonance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probably, one of these states was observed by the CHAOS Collaboration at TRIUMF, which measured the enhancement of the two-pion invariant mass spectrum near threshold only for rather heavy nuclei [15]. The model of a localized state of the ∆ isobar in nuclear matter [16], so-called "delta ball," could explain the value of the cross section and the small width of the corresponding resonance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first explanation, that of dibaryons [24], has later been rejected due to the narrow width of the peak, ϳ1.5 MeV, which does not agree with the width due to the nucleon Fermi motion in Cu. More recent explanations include two-pion [28] and two-D [26] or D-ball [29,30] states.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%