2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pioneer countries and the global diffusion of environmental innovations: Theses from the viewpoint of ecological modernisation theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
94
0
11

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
94
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…As documented in the empirical literature, many ESTs have first been innovated within regulatory leader countries in response to domestic environmental standards, which have stimulated local demand for associated compliance technologies (Beise and Rennings 2005;Brandt and Svendsen 2006;Popp 2006). However, once a particular compliance technology has been developed to comply with a specific standard, the adoption of similar environmental standards elsewhere may lead to its cross-border transfer (Beise and Rennings 2005;Huber 2008). Firms in early-regulating ("leader") source countries are likely to possess a competitive advantage vis-à-vis potential domestic competitors in later-regulating ("follower") countries, stemming from the fact that their pre-existing compliance technologies benefit from dynamic scale economies and learning effects (Brandt and Svendsen 2006).…”
Section: Understanding the Relationship Between Environmental Regulatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As documented in the empirical literature, many ESTs have first been innovated within regulatory leader countries in response to domestic environmental standards, which have stimulated local demand for associated compliance technologies (Beise and Rennings 2005;Brandt and Svendsen 2006;Popp 2006). However, once a particular compliance technology has been developed to comply with a specific standard, the adoption of similar environmental standards elsewhere may lead to its cross-border transfer (Beise and Rennings 2005;Huber 2008). Firms in early-regulating ("leader") source countries are likely to possess a competitive advantage vis-à-vis potential domestic competitors in later-regulating ("follower") countries, stemming from the fact that their pre-existing compliance technologies benefit from dynamic scale economies and learning effects (Brandt and Svendsen 2006).…”
Section: Understanding the Relationship Between Environmental Regulatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The core argument of EM is that although democracy, the state and the market have gone astray, they can be restructured to make them sustainable (Christoff 1996;Mol and Spaargaren 2000;Dryzek 2005;Howes 2005). EM argues that economic growth can be decoupled from raw material throughput, energy use and waste generation through the application of new technology and the redesign of institutions (Berger et al 2001;Janicke and Jacob 2004;Dryzek 2005;Howes 2005;Huber 2008;Janicke 2008).…”
Section: The Themes Of Ecological Modernisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It assumes that well designed interventions by government do not hinder economic growth but instead stimulate new and more efficient industries (Blowers 1997;Weale 1998;Mol and Sonnenfeld 2000;Janicke and Jacob 2004;Huber 2008;Janicke 2008). Industry reduces its costs from increased technological efficiency and both the environment and community benefit from less pollution.…”
Section: The Themes Of Ecological Modernisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations