2019
DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics4030056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pioneering Construction Materials through Prototypological Research

Abstract: The article at hand follows the understanding that future cities cannot be built the same way as existing ones, inducing a radical paradigm shift in how we produce and use materials for the construction of our habitat in the 21st century. In search of a methodology for an integrated, holistic, and interdisciplinary development of such new materials and construction technologies, the chair of Sustainable Construction at KIT Karlsruhe proposes the concept of “prototypological” research. Coined through joining th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This will be achieved by minimizing life cycle impacts and capturing and disposing of emission rates [8]. 4 The proto-typological design of the green responsive system Heisel and Hebel introduce the concept of proto-typology [9], a significant paradigm shift in the use and innovation of construction materials. This term, a blend of "prototype" and "typology," signifies the application of full-scale models to enhance sustainability and resource efficiency in construction.…”
Section: Methodological Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This will be achieved by minimizing life cycle impacts and capturing and disposing of emission rates [8]. 4 The proto-typological design of the green responsive system Heisel and Hebel introduce the concept of proto-typology [9], a significant paradigm shift in the use and innovation of construction materials. This term, a blend of "prototype" and "typology," signifies the application of full-scale models to enhance sustainability and resource efficiency in construction.…”
Section: Methodological Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common approach has been to create mycelium building blocks that are assembled into larger structures. However, this application often relies on substructures, and is geometrically quite limiting due to the inherent properties of mycelium that only allows for structures in compression [ 7 , 16 ]. Studies have also been carried out on monolithic mycelium constructions, but these systems require either large scaffolds or extensive reinforcement systems that in most cases take over the structural functions and reduce the mycelium to a surface finishing, rather than a load-bearing material [ 17 ].…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the structure can bear the load without sub-structures. In 2019, Mycotree 2.0, a smaller structure made with the same material and technique, was shown in Shaping the Future exhibition in Berlin (Heisel and Hebel 2019). Regarding the complexity of the components, Mycotree is an exemplary project.…”
Section: Large-scale Architectural Pavilionsmentioning
confidence: 99%