1996
DOI: 10.1016/0378-7788(95)00941-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pioneering new indoor temperature standards: the Pakistan project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
68
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As described earlier, previous researchers [11] studying other traditional people living in mountains of Nepal calculated a mean neutral temperature of 10.7 °C, which is over nine degrees lower than the coldest winter value determined by Ref. [15]. Despite the difficulty of comparing peoples' perceptions of comfort, the authors know from their own experience of living and working in Humla that people do feel cold and that this effects their health and well-being.…”
Section: Comfort Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As described earlier, previous researchers [11] studying other traditional people living in mountains of Nepal calculated a mean neutral temperature of 10.7 °C, which is over nine degrees lower than the coldest winter value determined by Ref. [15]. Despite the difficulty of comparing peoples' perceptions of comfort, the authors know from their own experience of living and working in Humla that people do feel cold and that this effects their health and well-being.…”
Section: Comfort Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The longitudinal study of Ref. [15] of subjects in five climatic zones of Pakistan demonstrates this difference in perception. The winter comfort temperatures vary by 5.3 °C between the coldest and warmest zones.…”
Section: Comfort Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the results, the nearest predicted value of thermal neutrality T n to the 30.7 o C obtained in this study was the T n from Nicol and Roaf (1996) equation: 27.64 o C (T n = 17 + 0.38T oav ) which was less by as much as 3.06 deg C. It should be noted that all calculated T n values were less than the obtained value of 30.7 o C. The obtained T n in this study was therefore higher than the values predicted by these models. This indicated that the respondents tolerated higher temperatures by 3.06 deg C above the predictions from the examined Nicol and Roaf T n equation, 3.65 deg C above Griffith"s equation, 3.85 deg C above Humphreys" equation, 4.22 deg C above deDear"s equation and 4.42 deg C above Auliciems" equation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Auliciems (1981) gave the equation T n = 17.6 + 0.31T oav while Griffiths (1990) provided the equation: T n = 12.1 + 0.534T oav . Also, Nicol and Roaf (1996) deduced the equation: T n = 17 + 0.38T oav , while the deDear et al (1997) equation is T n = 17.8 + 0.31 T oav .…”
Section: Environmental Management and Sustainable Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Fanger's model has failed in the results for naturally-ventilated buildings and increasing dissatisfaction with this approach has driven interest in a variable indoor temperature standards model [19]. Nicol and Roaf [20] suggested the Equation (1) model for occupants of naturally-ventilated buildings. Other adaptive models are suggested by Humphrey's models [21] for neutral temperature, as given by Equations (2) and (3).…”
Section: Comfort Zonementioning
confidence: 99%