2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2010.06.087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pipe fittings in duplex stainless steel with deviation in quality caused by sigma phase precipitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The procedure for the manual point count is described in more detail in Børvik et al (2010), while both estimated and counted sigma phase levels are given in Table 2. The agreement between the assumed and measured sigma phase levels was judged to be acceptable.…”
Section: Astm E662 "Standard Test Methods For Determining Volume Fractmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The procedure for the manual point count is described in more detail in Børvik et al (2010), while both estimated and counted sigma phase levels are given in Table 2. The agreement between the assumed and measured sigma phase levels was judged to be acceptable.…”
Section: Astm E662 "Standard Test Methods For Determining Volume Fractmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measured Cauchy stress versus logarithmic strain curves to failure are shown in Fig. 2 for the duplex stainless steel with different levels of sigma phase (Børvik et al 2010). The influence of the hard and brittle sigma phase into the originally ductile material is a slightly higher tensile stress level and a marked reduction in the strain to failure.…”
Section: Materials and Test Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations