1993
DOI: 10.5547/issn0195-6574-ej-vol14-no4-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pipeline Access and Market Integration in the Natural Gas Industry: Evidence from Cointegration Tests

Abstract: This research seeks to determine the extent to which the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s policy of “Open Access” to natural gas pipelines has created competition in natural gas markets. We argue that recently developed cointegration techniques are the natural way to evaluate competition between natural gas spot markets at dispersed points in the national transmission network. We test daily spot prices between 190 market-pairs located in 20 producing fields and pipeline interconnections and find that the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As noted by De Vany and Walls (1993), for example, prior to FERC Order 436 the requirement that pipelines buy and sell gas through long-term contracts precluded the development of spot markets for natural gas. De Vany and Walls noted that there were many reasons why deregulation might not have allowed arbitrage to lead to a convergence of natural gas prices: "bottleneck monopolies in the grid; poor coordination between gas purchases and transportation; risk averse buyers reluctant to rely on the spot market, creating a lack of depth and liquidity; excessively volatile prices; distributor city gates that are closed or difficult for buyers to get through; a lack of knowledge and experience on the part of gas producers and buyers long accustomed to regulated prices and long-term contracts; and questions about the incentives of regulated distributors to seek out lower cost gas."…”
Section: Effects Of Increasing Spot Market Liquiditymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted by De Vany and Walls (1993), for example, prior to FERC Order 436 the requirement that pipelines buy and sell gas through long-term contracts precluded the development of spot markets for natural gas. De Vany and Walls noted that there were many reasons why deregulation might not have allowed arbitrage to lead to a convergence of natural gas prices: "bottleneck monopolies in the grid; poor coordination between gas purchases and transportation; risk averse buyers reluctant to rely on the spot market, creating a lack of depth and liquidity; excessively volatile prices; distributor city gates that are closed or difficult for buyers to get through; a lack of knowledge and experience on the part of gas producers and buyers long accustomed to regulated prices and long-term contracts; and questions about the incentives of regulated distributors to seek out lower cost gas."…”
Section: Effects Of Increasing Spot Market Liquiditymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De Vany and Walls (1993) pioneered the literature on gas market integration. The authors use cointegration analysis to show how unbundling pipeline ownership and capacity rights increased integration of regional spot prices in the United States.…”
Section: Empirics: Cointegration and Lng Pricesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PG is represented by the price of gas at the Henry Hub in Louisiana, which is the reference price for gas exchanges in the United States and Canada. This price Iargely represents exchanges of gas negotiated at the close of the previous month during a period called bid week when contracts for guaranteed deliveries of gas for the month are signed (for a discussion of spot and futures prices see [3][4][5][6][7]). An appealing characteristic of EIA storage or inventory data is that it represents inventories at the end of the month.…”
Section: Specification and Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%