2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2020.102220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pipeline corrosion assessment using piezo-sensors in reusable non-bonded configuration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under the same pressure load, p = 15.6534 MPa is taken as the first example and p = 13.2534 MPa is taken as the second example. The von Mises stress distribution field is shown in Figures 20 and 21 In Tables 9 and 10, for the first example with l o = l o = 2 mm, s = 2 mm, and l i = l i = 6 mm, under the same pressure load p = 15.6534 MPa, the interference scale factors including γ 1 Mises , γ 2 Mises , and γ 3 Mises are compared. Owing to the interference of the 6 mm crack on the 2 mm crack, γ 1 Mises =1.3897, i.e., the von Mises stress peak value at crack tip T 1 for the double-crack case (2 mm and 6 mm, respectively) is 1.3897 times as large as the peak value at the crack tip T 1 when only the single 2 mm crack exists.…”
Section: Effect Of Crack Size On Crack Interferencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Under the same pressure load, p = 15.6534 MPa is taken as the first example and p = 13.2534 MPa is taken as the second example. The von Mises stress distribution field is shown in Figures 20 and 21 In Tables 9 and 10, for the first example with l o = l o = 2 mm, s = 2 mm, and l i = l i = 6 mm, under the same pressure load p = 15.6534 MPa, the interference scale factors including γ 1 Mises , γ 2 Mises , and γ 3 Mises are compared. Owing to the interference of the 6 mm crack on the 2 mm crack, γ 1 Mises =1.3897, i.e., the von Mises stress peak value at crack tip T 1 for the double-crack case (2 mm and 6 mm, respectively) is 1.3897 times as large as the peak value at the crack tip T 1 when only the single 2 mm crack exists.…”
Section: Effect Of Crack Size On Crack Interferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fractures of storage tank steel and pipeline steel are generally ductile fractures. Once ductile fractures occur, the cracks will gradually propagate and are difficult to stop until the above-mentioned catastrophic accidents are caused [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Cracks in actual pipelines mostly exist in the form of crack groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research underscores the challenges posed by the complex rebar surface and assesses the effectiveness of proposed configurations. Raju et al 21 present non-bonded piezo configurations to monitor corrosion-induced damage in pipeline structures. This study shows a potential replacement for typical bonded piezo sensors for corrosion detection and assessment in pipeline However, the repeatability of the impedance signatures is a critical factor that affects the reliability of the monitoring systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these years, the EMA technique concerning the use of epoxy-bonded PZTs has been effectively extended for metallic, composite, and concrete SDD applications. [5][6][7][8][9][10] However, the accuracy of SDD highly depends on the ability of the adhesive layer to transfer the stress and strain through shear lag mechanism; meanwhile, any defects in the adhesive layer inevitably alter the coupled EMA signatures. Bonding defects, such as incomplete solidification or softening, are easily induced by environmental impact or improper operation in long-range monitoring practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%