2020
DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyz548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pipeline Embolization Device for Treatment of Extracranial Internal Carotid Artery Pseudoaneurysms: A Multicenter Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy

Abstract: BACKGROUND There is a paucity of literature regarding treatment options for extracranial pseudoaneurysms of the internal carotid artery (ICA). To date, Pipeline Embolization Device (PED; Medtronic Inc) use for the treatment of extracranial pseudoaneurysms of the ICA has only been reported from single-center case series. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the safety and efficacy of PED for the treatment of extracranial ICA pseudoaneurysms.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3,4 Flow diversion device has gradually become the preferred treatment for some carotid artery lesions in recent years; but, the technique also bears a risk of recurrence because the device cannot completely eliminate aneurysms immediately. 5 Covered stent grafts have been documented for the treatment of complex carotid artery lesions. [6][7][8][9][10][11] They not only provided immediate obliteration of the lesion but also preserved the normal lumen of the parent artery and promoted the growth and coverage of new endothelial cells 12 ; nevertheless, the challenges of thrombosis, stenosis, and the vessel structure may restrict the implantation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 Flow diversion device has gradually become the preferred treatment for some carotid artery lesions in recent years; but, the technique also bears a risk of recurrence because the device cannot completely eliminate aneurysms immediately. 5 Covered stent grafts have been documented for the treatment of complex carotid artery lesions. [6][7][8][9][10][11] They not only provided immediate obliteration of the lesion but also preserved the normal lumen of the parent artery and promoted the growth and coverage of new endothelial cells 12 ; nevertheless, the challenges of thrombosis, stenosis, and the vessel structure may restrict the implantation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CAS is the most common method of EVT for type III dissections with the presence of persistent flow-limiting dissections, continued dissecting pseudoaneurysm enlargement, or persistent local symptoms. Stent and stent graft with or without the simultaneous use of coil embolization can modulate blood flow and reconstruct the parent artery 32 . Technical success was achieved in all type III dissections with EVT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advancements in endovascular techniques have treatment options for EICAs, particularly those in high cervical segments. Endovascular methods, including covered stents, stent-assisted embolization, and ow-diverting devices [22][23][24] , offer alternatives to open surgery, particularly in cases where conventional exposure is challenging [10] . However, the limitations of endovascular treatment are evident, with reported risks of stroke, aneurysm rupture, and vascular injury [25] .…”
Section: Endovascular Intervention: Selective Yet Risk-ladenmentioning
confidence: 99%