2012
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dks111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Piperacillin/tazobactam (TazocinTM) seems to be no longer responsible for false-positive results of the galactomannan assay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
54
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As false positive results may occur, factors such as co-medication, underlying diseases, host factors, diagnostic imaging, clinical signs, and former medication of the patient must be taken into account for the correct interpretation of GM levels. [15][16][17] Furthermore, sensitivity of serum GM may decrease significantly in case of administration of antifungal prophylaxis or empirical/pre-emptive therapy. 18,19 Aspergillus PCR has been shown to be a very promising method for detection of fungal infection by using BALF or blood from immunocompromised patients, [20][21][22][23][24] especially when combined with the GM test 25,26 and performed early in the course of the infection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As false positive results may occur, factors such as co-medication, underlying diseases, host factors, diagnostic imaging, clinical signs, and former medication of the patient must be taken into account for the correct interpretation of GM levels. [15][16][17] Furthermore, sensitivity of serum GM may decrease significantly in case of administration of antifungal prophylaxis or empirical/pre-emptive therapy. 18,19 Aspergillus PCR has been shown to be a very promising method for detection of fungal infection by using BALF or blood from immunocompromised patients, [20][21][22][23][24] especially when combined with the GM test 25,26 and performed early in the course of the infection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test, however, has several limitations. As false-positive results may occur, patient factors, such as comedication (e.g., ␤-lactam antibacterials), underlying diseases, host factors (e.g., renal failure), diagnostic imaging, clinical signs, and former medication(s) must be taken into account to correctly interpret GM levels (15)(16)(17). Furthermore, some studies have shown that the sensitivity of the GM test decreases significantly in the case of the administration of antifungal prophylaxis/empirical therapy, whereas other reports have shown its usefulness for diagnosing breakthrough IFI (13,(18)(19)(20).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These outcomes are constant with the inspection that antifungal therapy might bring down the fungal burden in the lung tissue (12,(18)(19)(20). However, due to crossreactivity between GM antigen and some antibiotics (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28) in patients who receive these antibiotics, the result of the GM assay may be controversial. Thus, additional specific 4 Jundishapur J Microbiol.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%