2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02654.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Piriform cortex functional heterogeneity revealed by cellular responses to odours

Abstract: The role of the piriform cortex (PC) in olfactory information processing remains mainly unknown. Indeed, until recently, only a few studies have investigated the response of PC neurons to odours and these studies did not take into account the functional heterogeneity of the PC previously described using an electrical stimulation paradigm. In this experiment, extracellular activity in response to odour was recorded in urethane anaesthetized rats in the different parts of the cortex ranging from anterior to post… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
69
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
11
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One possible explanation for this difference is that c-Fos is not detected in neurons that are only weakly activated by an odorant. However, electrophysiological recordings similarly indicate that single odorants activate only a small percentage of neurons in the piriform cortex (32,33,35,36,38), arguing against this possibility. Another potential explanation for the observed difference between OR inputs and neuronal activation is that intrinsic inhibitory circuits shape odor responses in the cortex and eliminate responses to a particular odorant by many neurons that receive input from a given OR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One possible explanation for this difference is that c-Fos is not detected in neurons that are only weakly activated by an odorant. However, electrophysiological recordings similarly indicate that single odorants activate only a small percentage of neurons in the piriform cortex (32,33,35,36,38), arguing against this possibility. Another potential explanation for the observed difference between OR inputs and neuronal activation is that intrinsic inhibitory circuits shape odor responses in the cortex and eliminate responses to a particular odorant by many neurons that receive input from a given OR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the other extreme, signals from the different ORs might be targeted to many different locations, resulting in a highly distributed odor code. Previous electrophysiological studies (32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38) have described odorant responses by individual OC neurons but have not examined the spatial patterning of OC odor responses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to temporal patterns in odorant-evoked activity, phasic activity related to the respiratory cycle was prominent in most single units as has been reported previously (Wilson, 1998;Litaudon et al, 2003). The most direct explanation for this respiration-locked activity is a reflection of similar activity in the cortical afferent, mitral/tufted cells Chaput et al, 1992).…”
Section: Temporal Patternssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…At Ïł300 ms after the opening of final solenoid valve, vigorous firing of action potentials were evoked during the entire period of odorant application (2 s). The spike firing was rhythmic at 4 -5 Hz, suggesting activity coupled to respiratory cycles (Wilson, 1998;Litaudon et al, 2003;Rennaker et al, 2007). Moreover, the responses were reliable across multiple consecutive trials when the same odorant was presented (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%