2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2017.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PIT-tagging method for small fishes: A case study using sandeel ( Ammodytes tobianus )

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tag size was reduced over time, being 20 x 4.5 x 1 mm in 1958 (Bertelsen and Popp Madsen, 1958), 15 x 3 x 0.5 mm in later North Sea tags releases and 7 x 4 x 0.4 mm and 0.5 x 3 x 0.7 mm in Shetland releases (Gauld, 1990). Recent evidence based on larger pit tags suggests that these tags should not have adversely affected swimming ability (Jørgensen et al, 2017). Due to the limitations of body cavity and short life span, tagging was limited to length a range of 91< 179 mm (1+ age group).…”
Section: Post-settled Distribution and Movementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tag size was reduced over time, being 20 x 4.5 x 1 mm in 1958 (Bertelsen and Popp Madsen, 1958), 15 x 3 x 0.5 mm in later North Sea tags releases and 7 x 4 x 0.4 mm and 0.5 x 3 x 0.7 mm in Shetland releases (Gauld, 1990). Recent evidence based on larger pit tags suggests that these tags should not have adversely affected swimming ability (Jørgensen et al, 2017). Due to the limitations of body cavity and short life span, tagging was limited to length a range of 91< 179 mm (1+ age group).…”
Section: Post-settled Distribution and Movementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On day two after returning to the laboratory, individual fish were tagged, and tissue samples were taken from all individuals. Small passive integrated transponder ('PIT') tags (12 × 2 mm, 0.1 g, Oregon RFID Inc.) were injected into abdominal cavities with a syringe implanter (MK25, Biomark Inc.) under anaesthetic following standard procedures (using MS-222, Acros Organics, UK; Jørgensen et al 2017). These small passive tags do not affect survival and growth in round goby (Ruetz et al 2006;Cookingham and Ruetz III 2008), unlike larger (e.g.…”
Section: Individual Tagging Tissue Sampling and Physical Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical conditions measured within sites during sampling were similar (Søvang 16/5/21: 8.75ppt, 14.1 °C; Grønsund 18/5/21: 8.27ppt, 13.2 °C). Fish were transported to DTU Aqua, Lyngby, Denmark, and acclimated to laboratory conditions for 48 hours before being individually tagged with passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags (12 × 2 mm, 0.1 g, Oregon RFID Inc.), using previously published methods that have minimal effects of fish health and condition (Jørgensen et al, 2017).…”
Section: Fish and Holding Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%