Developments in Renewable Energies Offshore 2020
DOI: 10.1201/9781003134572-59
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pitch bearing case study with supervisory control data of 7MW wind turbine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The parameters differ mainly in the double oscillating amplitude θ that was chosen to be 0.7 (x/2b = 2.67) and 3.0 (x/2b =11.44). These values are typical for modern wind turbine pitch bearings 10,36,54,55 and can be reproduced with the test bench.…”
Section: Experimental Approachmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The parameters differ mainly in the double oscillating amplitude θ that was chosen to be 0.7 (x/2b = 2.67) and 3.0 (x/2b =11.44). These values are typical for modern wind turbine pitch bearings 10,36,54,55 and can be reproduced with the test bench.…”
Section: Experimental Approachmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The oscillating frequency of 0.5 Hz was kept constant for all the experiments. Both bearing types were tested under a maximum contact pressure of 2 GPa, which represents typical pitch bearing operating conditions 10,13,36,54,55 . Due to the different contact geometry and contact angle of the bearing types and the adapted number of rolling elements for each type, the same axial load was applied for both bearings to reach 2 GPa.…”
Section: Experimental Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation