1972
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(72)90718-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pitch correction in (g-2) experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
1

Year Published

1974
1974
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The a i and b i are coefficients for the sextupole currents determined by the emittance and dispersion at the location of the sextupole magnets. The B term also includes contributions from the so-called pitch effect [28] since these also depend on θ 2 y . A linear function serves to describe the measurements in the lower panel of Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The a i and b i are coefficients for the sextupole currents determined by the emittance and dispersion at the location of the sextupole magnets. The B term also includes contributions from the so-called pitch effect [28] since these also depend on θ 2 y . A linear function serves to describe the measurements in the lower panel of Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early evaluations of the pitch correction by Wilkinson and Crane [19], Henry and Silver [20], and Fierz and Telegdi [18] were superseded by the analysis of Granger and Ford [21] which, for the first time, took proper account of the changes in pitch angle. Farley [22] obtained the same results with a different approach, and extended the analysis to include both electric and magnetic focusing. (See also Field and Fiorentini [23]).…”
Section: Pitch Correctionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…26 For n = 0.135, v = 4 cm, r = 700 cm, the pitch correction was 0.5 ppm. The statistical error in the mean radius was typically 0.1−0.2 mm.…”
Section: Radial Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%