2013
DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0333)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pitch Variability in Patients With Parkinson’s Disease: Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation of Caudal Zona Incerta and Subthalamic Nucleus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 for an overview), has been proposed as a promising alternative target for DBS treatment for motor symptoms of PD, with one study suggesting greater improvement in gross motor symptoms with cZi stimulation than with stimulation of the STN (21). Furthermore, we have not found any positive effect in terms of improving the monopitch quality in speech due to cZi-DBS (10), and voice intensity may show a small reduction during cZi stimulation (9). Furthermore, we have not found any positive effect in terms of improving the monopitch quality in speech due to cZi-DBS (10), and voice intensity may show a small reduction during cZi stimulation (9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 for an overview), has been proposed as a promising alternative target for DBS treatment for motor symptoms of PD, with one study suggesting greater improvement in gross motor symptoms with cZi stimulation than with stimulation of the STN (21). Furthermore, we have not found any positive effect in terms of improving the monopitch quality in speech due to cZi-DBS (10), and voice intensity may show a small reduction during cZi stimulation (9). Furthermore, we have not found any positive effect in terms of improving the monopitch quality in speech due to cZi-DBS (10), and voice intensity may show a small reduction during cZi stimulation (9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…However, the results have been more mixed in terms of speech. Affection of speech is common in the movement disorders for which DBS might be beneficial, but DBS is known to cause a variety of speech-related side effects in several neurological conditions (e.g., [6][7][8][9][10][11]. Specifically for STN-DBS treatment for patients with PD, while some studies have reported no effect (5,12) or only short-term positive effects (13,14), a majority of studies have reported a reduction in overall speech quality or intelligibility due to stimulation (e.g., [15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though there are diverse pharmacological and surgical treatment options available to alleviate motor symptoms in PD, their effect on the dysarthria is limited and variable (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14). The leading treatment option for speech and voice symptoms in PD today is the LSVT LOUD V R Lee Silverman Voice Treatment (LSVT Global, Tucson, AZ) (15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is associated with minimal morbidity and is effective also for PD patients that have ceased to respond L-dopa (Levodopa) treatment (Breit et al 2004). DBS has generally been found to improve gross motor functioning as well as patients' quality of life (Daniels et al 2011), but has also been shown a potential for causing a variety of speech-related side effects in several neurological conditions (e.g., Blomstedt et al 2011b;Karlsson et al 2011Karlsson et al , 2013Karlsson et al , 2014Lundgren et al 2011;Fytagoridis et al 2012Fytagoridis et al , 2013. For patients with PD, traditional targets include the STN (subthalamic nucleus) (Benabid 2003) and the GPi (globus pallidus pars interna) (Rodriguez-Oroz et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%