2016
DOI: 10.1038/srep23671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pitfalls in assessing microvascular endothelial barrier function: impedance-based devices versus the classic macromolecular tracer assay

Abstract: The most frequently used parameters to describe the barrier properties of endothelial cells (ECs) in vitro are (i) the macromolecular permeability, indicating the flux of a macromolecular tracer across the endothelium, and (ii) electrical impedance of ECs grown on gold-film electrodes reporting on the cell layer’s tightness for ion flow. Due to the experimental differences between these approaches, inconsistent observations have been described. Here, we present the first direct comparison of these assays appli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
114
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
114
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To determine the dependence of the barrier function of CPEC monolayers on Mpdz, we compared the time course of impedance, an established permeability surrogate (Bischoff et al , ), of human papilloma CPEC (hpCPEC) monolayers (Ishiwata et al , ; Feldner et al , ) transduced by MPDZ ‐targeting or by non‐targeting shRNA. The impedance of the control group was persistently higher throughout the 70‐h duration of the measurement (Fig E).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the dependence of the barrier function of CPEC monolayers on Mpdz, we compared the time course of impedance, an established permeability surrogate (Bischoff et al , ), of human papilloma CPEC (hpCPEC) monolayers (Ishiwata et al , ; Feldner et al , ) transduced by MPDZ ‐targeting or by non‐targeting shRNA. The impedance of the control group was persistently higher throughout the 70‐h duration of the measurement (Fig E).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this technique, a decrease in resistance reflects disruption of the endothelial barrier, and the larger the resistance decrease the greater the barrier disruption. An advantage of using ECIS is that it allows real‐time monitoring of the endothelial barrier . Again, we used the same doxycycline‐inducible S100A6 over‐expressing cell system and measured changes in resistance following activation of I SOC with rolipram/thapsigargin.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment of the cells with HOE140, enalaprilat, and captopril was started 30 minutes before FITC‐dextran or FITC‐albumin was added. Absolute permeability P [cm/s] was calculated by the following Equation :P=[Ct-0.333333emnormalCt0]·VA·t·normalC0…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%