2015
DOI: 10.4103/2277-9175.164009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pitfalls in molecular diagnosis of 21-hydroxylase deficiency in congenital adrenal hyperplasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Molecular genetic analysis of CYP21A2 was performed either by targeted analysis through screening of the most common CYP21A2 pathogenic variants or sequencing the entire coding region and exon-intron boundaries of CYP21A2. In this multicenter study, various molecular methodologies including allele specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR), reverse dot-blot method, PCR-RFLP, and reversehybridization strip-based assay were used to screen common pathogenic variants as previously described (Németh et al, 2012;Kolahdouz et al, 2015;Özyılmaz et al, 2018). Most of the inactivating mutations or deletions are generated by gene conversion or unequal crossing over between the functional (CYP21A2) gene and a highly homologous nonfunctional pseudogene CYP21A1P (Kolahdouz et al, 2015).…”
Section: Molecular Analyses Of Cyp21a2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Molecular genetic analysis of CYP21A2 was performed either by targeted analysis through screening of the most common CYP21A2 pathogenic variants or sequencing the entire coding region and exon-intron boundaries of CYP21A2. In this multicenter study, various molecular methodologies including allele specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR), reverse dot-blot method, PCR-RFLP, and reversehybridization strip-based assay were used to screen common pathogenic variants as previously described (Németh et al, 2012;Kolahdouz et al, 2015;Özyılmaz et al, 2018). Most of the inactivating mutations or deletions are generated by gene conversion or unequal crossing over between the functional (CYP21A2) gene and a highly homologous nonfunctional pseudogene CYP21A1P (Kolahdouz et al, 2015).…”
Section: Molecular Analyses Of Cyp21a2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this multicenter study, various molecular methodologies including allele specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR), reverse dot-blot method, PCR-RFLP, and reversehybridization strip-based assay were used to screen common pathogenic variants as previously described (Németh et al, 2012;Kolahdouz et al, 2015;Özyılmaz et al, 2018). Most of the inactivating mutations or deletions are generated by gene conversion or unequal crossing over between the functional (CYP21A2) gene and a highly homologous nonfunctional pseudogene CYP21A1P (Kolahdouz et al, 2015). Pseudogene derived common pathogenic variants (c.92C>T; p. P31L, c.293-13C>G (formerly known as: In2G, IVS2-13C>G), c.332_339del-GAGACTAC; p. Gly111Valfs*21, c.518T>A; p. Ile173Asn, Exon 6 cluster (c. 710T>A; p. Ile237Asn, c.713T> A; p. Val238Glu, c.719T>A; p. Met240Lys), c.844G> T; p. Val282Leu, c.923dupT; p. Leu308PhefsTer6, c.955C >T; p. Gln319Ter, c.1069C>T; p. Arg357Trp and c.1360C>T; p. Pro454Ser) account for approximately 90-95% point mutations (Krone and Arlt, 2009;Narasimhan and Khattab, 2019).…”
Section: Molecular Analyses Of Cyp21a2mentioning
confidence: 99%