2001
DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.21.1.g01ja0523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pitfalls in MR Cholangiopancreatographic Interpretation

Abstract: Magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is widely used in the evaluation of pancreatobiliary disorders. However, numerous related pitfalls may simulate or mask pancreatobiliary disease. Maximum-intensity-projection (MIP) reconstructed images completely obscure small filling defects and may demonstrate respiratory motion artifacts. T2 weighting may vary with different MR imaging sequences and influence MRCP findings. Incomplete imaging may create confusion regarding ductal anatomy or disease. Fu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
0
6

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
61
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…It allows obtaining images of the pancreaticobiliary similar to the endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERCP) without the morbidity associated with the complications resulting from diagnostic ERCP [12][13][14] . Although MRCP has been shown to be accurate in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis, malignant biliary obstruction and other congenital biliary tract anomalies, awareness of several potential pitfalls is crucial to avoid inappropriate interpretation [6] . High signal intensity from the intestinal fluids superimposed on the biliary tract is one of the pitfalls that interfere with the interpretation (Figure 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It allows obtaining images of the pancreaticobiliary similar to the endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERCP) without the morbidity associated with the complications resulting from diagnostic ERCP [12][13][14] . Although MRCP has been shown to be accurate in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis, malignant biliary obstruction and other congenital biliary tract anomalies, awareness of several potential pitfalls is crucial to avoid inappropriate interpretation [6] . High signal intensity from the intestinal fluids superimposed on the biliary tract is one of the pitfalls that interfere with the interpretation (Figure 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, the CO2 might enter the papilla of Vater in patients with incompetent papilla. This would subsequently lead to pneumobilia which may mimic choledocholithiasis [6] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In cases where ductal stones are of concern, MR cholangiography offers 90% sensitivity for detection of common duct stones (50). This can be performed with thick-slab, heavily T 2 -weighted sequences and with thin-slice axial sequences to ensure that artifacts are not misinterpreted as stones (51). Stones are visualized as hypointense filling defects with respect to the adjacent hyperintense bile on T 2 -weighted imaging.…”
Section: Biliary Causes Of Abdominopelvic Painmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously reported, the utilization of MR cholangiography with specific contrast agents for studying the biliary tract, as well as further investigation about the utilization of paramagnetic contras agents such as gadobenate dimeglumine have contributed for improvement of the method. Recently, single-shot fast spin echo sequences were adopted as a standard method for MR cholangiography (26) , and new sequences such as half Fourier RARE have demonstrated technical advances, allowing imaging of the whole biliary tract during a single 18-second breath-hold (27) . Maybe the utilization of the described sequences, if available, could result in better images as those already reported by some authors (9,11) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%