2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10140-022-02042-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pitfalls in the interpretation of pediatric head CTs: what the emergency radiologist needs to know

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial literature review screened more than 200 articles, from which relevant articles were reviewed in detail. Twenty candidate criterion statements were developed based on published general/procedural criteria, 4,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] as well as specific criteria for emergent vascular access, [17][18][19][20] crystalloid volume/ timing, 21 surgical intervention, 22,23 anesthesia/sedation, [24][25][26][27][28] intensive care, 29 transfusion, 30,31 blunt abdominal trauma/solid organ injury, [32][33][34] diagnostic/interventional radiology, [35][36][37][38] child abuse, 39,40 and rehabilitation. [41][42][43][44][45] Fifteen panelists participated in the initial feedback session.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial literature review screened more than 200 articles, from which relevant articles were reviewed in detail. Twenty candidate criterion statements were developed based on published general/procedural criteria, 4,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] as well as specific criteria for emergent vascular access, [17][18][19][20] crystalloid volume/ timing, 21 surgical intervention, 22,23 anesthesia/sedation, [24][25][26][27][28] intensive care, 29 transfusion, 30,31 blunt abdominal trauma/solid organ injury, [32][33][34] diagnostic/interventional radiology, [35][36][37][38] child abuse, 39,40 and rehabilitation. [41][42][43][44][45] Fifteen panelists participated in the initial feedback session.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 31 Additionally, radiologists who initially interpreted HCT were not all pediatric radiologists; hence, we could not exclude whether some age-related specificities were misinterpreted. 26 , 32 , 33 , 34 Although all had at least 2.5 years of experience in emergency radiology and could refer to a senior radiologist for complementary advice during the on-call period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%