2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2015.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pitfalls of decomposition weights in the additive multi-stage DEA model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…About the specification of decomposition weights, many works (e.g., Cook et al [36]) chose the endogenous weights that define the weights w p as the virtual inputs (outputs) of stage p divided by total virtual inputs (outputs), representing the relative importance or contribution of the performance of each stage, respectively, to the overall performance of the DMU in the whole process. However, Ang and Chen [37] found that these endogenous weights implied that upstream stages (regardless the stage efficiency scores) in the model would obtain higher priority in efficiency decomposition, which meant that the earlier stages would obtain higher decomposition weights and have a greater influence on the overall efficiency. In the two-stage model, for example, this means that the decomposition weight of the first stage will be at least as high as 0.5.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…About the specification of decomposition weights, many works (e.g., Cook et al [36]) chose the endogenous weights that define the weights w p as the virtual inputs (outputs) of stage p divided by total virtual inputs (outputs), representing the relative importance or contribution of the performance of each stage, respectively, to the overall performance of the DMU in the whole process. However, Ang and Chen [37] found that these endogenous weights implied that upstream stages (regardless the stage efficiency scores) in the model would obtain higher priority in efficiency decomposition, which meant that the earlier stages would obtain higher decomposition weights and have a greater influence on the overall efficiency. In the two-stage model, for example, this means that the decomposition weight of the first stage will be at least as high as 0.5.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve Equation (6), we adopt Ang and Chen's method [37]. In the first step, we calculate the bounds for the optimal efficiency scores of two stages.…”
Section: Definition 2 the Stage K Sub-dmu Is Said To Be Efficient Ifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen's model has the drawback that biased toward the second stage (Despotis, Koronakos, & Sotiros, 2016). A new approach to estimate the unique and unbiased efficiency scores for the individual stages is developed by Despotis et al (2016) and is extended by Ang and Chen (2016). Their work indicates the interference of weights with the estimated stage efficiencies and OE.…”
Section: Application Of Dea In Measuring Sez Performancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kao (2014) summarised a wide range of network DEA studies that were based on problems identified and the models that have been developed and applied to them. The most recent studies with regard to network DEA focus on the stage weights applied in the model, and their impact in determining stage and overall efficiencies (Ang & Chen, 2016;Despotis, 2016;Guo, Shureshjani, Foroughi & Zhu, 2016). These studies reveal an emphasis on refinements in the theory, whereas the purpose here is to review existing network DEA applications in order to determine their usefulness in performance measurement systems for support units within businesses.…”
Section: Data Envelopment Analysis In Performance Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%