2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.09.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pitfalls of Externally Initiated Collective Action: A Case Study from South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 3 compares the different measures of trust for Namibia and South Africa from three different sources: this study, another experimental study (Vollan, 2011) and a social capital survey (own data published in Vollan, 2012). There is a country difference in all questionnaire items (5, 11 and 15 percentage points) and experimental measures (20 percentage points), therefore indicating that trust was higher in Namibia than in South Africa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 3 compares the different measures of trust for Namibia and South Africa from three different sources: this study, another experimental study (Vollan, 2011) and a social capital survey (own data published in Vollan, 2012). There is a country difference in all questionnaire items (5, 11 and 15 percentage points) and experimental measures (20 percentage points), therefore indicating that trust was higher in Namibia than in South Africa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, one of the earliest notable concerns of the concept of social capital was based on the premise that it reproduces social inequalities in society [36]. Evidence shows that interventions originating from outside the community create inequalities and asymmetries of power in communities [37, 38], affect local innovations in managing community problems, increase dependence on external actors [39] and potentially facilitate elite capture [40, 41]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critiques of the institutional impacts of community management have also proliferated. A considerable literature has noted the dangers of localism, including the risks of elite capture (e.g., Cleaver, ; Mohan and Stokke, ; Botchway, ; Vollan, ). As Mansuri and Rao () have observed, there is a fundamental distinction between induced and emergent participation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%