2012
DOI: 10.1107/s0021889812038733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pitfalls of local and quantitative phase analysis in partially stabilized zirconia

Abstract: When the formulae for calculating the interplanar spacing d 0 hkl for the seven primary lattices among the 14 Bravais lattices are used for crystal structures containing an additional atom, d 0 hkl must be corrected by multiplying by a correction coefficient. Based on a simple principle of analytical geometry, a new position-factor method has been developed to calculate these correction coefficients. The position factor P [where P = hx + ky + lz = s + m/q, the scalar product of the position (x, y, z) of an add… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This, in turn, is attributable to the lower average atomic number of the compound. Within the zirconia particles, the black spots are mainly MgO, which is precipitated at the internal interfaces as reported elsewhere [33]. Furthermore, only a small monoclinic phase fraction is visible in the particles (see Figure 8b,c), because the monoclinic phase appears brighter in the image than the initial phase.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This, in turn, is attributable to the lower average atomic number of the compound. Within the zirconia particles, the black spots are mainly MgO, which is precipitated at the internal interfaces as reported elsewhere [33]. Furthermore, only a small monoclinic phase fraction is visible in the particles (see Figure 8b,c), because the monoclinic phase appears brighter in the image than the initial phase.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…~0.14%. Some work concerning a similar problem with cubic zirconia compared to tetragonal zirconia, which has only a slight tetragonal distortion, has been presented by Martin et al 46.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These m‐ZrO 2 crystallites did not undergo the phase transition from c/t‐ZrO 2 to m‐ZrO 2 during the deformation process, but they were already present in the initial zirconia powder or occurred as a consequence of the decomposition of c/t‐(Zr,Mg)O 2 into m‐ZrO 2 and MgO during sintering . Vice versa the local appearance of m‐ZrO 2 is controlled by a different amount of the Mg stabilizer that results in different driving forces for the t‐ZrO 2 → m‐ZrO 2 transformation, as well . As these originally monoclinic zirconia particles do not transform during the deformation process, they cannot contribute to an enhanced plasticity of the TRIP steel matrix by generating an additional internal strain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The c‐ZrO 2 and t‐ZrO 2 phases were not treated separately, but as a cubic phase, because of the crystallographic similarity. In general, XRD is capable of distinguishing these two phases, but due to the small amount of Mg‐PSZ, the intensities are too low to separate them properly …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%