2008
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1264805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pitfalls of Participatory Programs: Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation in Education in India

Abstract: Participation of beneficiaries in the monitoring of public services is increasingly seen as a key to improving their efficiency. In India, the current government flagship program on universal primary education organizes both locally elected leaders and parents of children enrolled in public schools into committees and gives these groups powers over resource allocation, and monitoring and management of school performance. However, in a baseline survey we found that people were not aware of the existence of thes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
78
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Banerjee et al (2010) find that providing information to citizens in Uttar Pradesh about the role of the local village education committee and about the quality of learning in local schools had no impact on parental involvement in the school system. Keefer and Khemani (2011) employ a natural experiment in Benin built around within--commune variation in access to community radio programming to evaluate the effects of information dissemination on literacy, government inputs to education, citizen involvement in Parent--Teacher Association meetings, and private investments in children's learning.…”
Section: Relation To the Literaturementioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Banerjee et al (2010) find that providing information to citizens in Uttar Pradesh about the role of the local village education committee and about the quality of learning in local schools had no impact on parental involvement in the school system. Keefer and Khemani (2011) employ a natural experiment in Benin built around within--commune variation in access to community radio programming to evaluate the effects of information dissemination on literacy, government inputs to education, citizen involvement in Parent--Teacher Association meetings, and private investments in children's learning.…”
Section: Relation To the Literaturementioning
confidence: 81%
“…One of the advantages of the intervention we study here is that it combines these different types of information. Like Banerjee et al (2010) and Pandey et al (2009), the interventions we evaluate involve information about both the quality of children's learning and how citizens might improve it. 8…”
Section: Relation To the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Banerjee et al (2010), we condition on the baseline values of all variables included in the summary index. For instance, for outcome variable d included in summary index d, the impact is estimated by…”
Section: Impact On Intermediate Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In education, reforms aiming to improve accountability by increasing parental participation in schools -also called schoolbased management reforms (e.g. Banerjee et al, 2010;Blimpo and Evans, 2011;Duflo et al, 2011;Pradhan et al 2011) provide mixed evidence of success, yet the reasons for the contrasting results obtained in different societies are unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%