2016
DOI: 10.5055/jem.2016.0299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Place attachment and disasters: Knowns and unknowns

Abstract: When considering the factors important for disaster recovery, one must consider the attachment individuals have toward their living area. This article reviews and synthesizes the current literature on the determinants of place attachment in the context of postdisaster recovery. Although the majority of the reviewed articles focused on disaster recovery, there were some which had a broader scope and were included due to their importance. This research categorizes the determinants of place attachment into four c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The person element concerns the actor who is attached; place concerns the object of attachment, including concrete and abstract elements of a place to which one is attached; psychological process refers to (how the attachment manifests; psychological elements of attachment; see also, Lewicka, 2011 ; Counted, 2016 ; Manzo and Devine-Wright, 2020 ). To contextualize this framework for disaster settings, Jamali and Nejat (2016) provide a broad conceptual map of demographic, socioeconomic, spatial and psychological factors that act as ‘parameters of place attachment’. However, they do not delve into the psychological factors.…”
Section: Background and Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The person element concerns the actor who is attached; place concerns the object of attachment, including concrete and abstract elements of a place to which one is attached; psychological process refers to (how the attachment manifests; psychological elements of attachment; see also, Lewicka, 2011 ; Counted, 2016 ; Manzo and Devine-Wright, 2020 ). To contextualize this framework for disaster settings, Jamali and Nejat (2016) provide a broad conceptual map of demographic, socioeconomic, spatial and psychological factors that act as ‘parameters of place attachment’. However, they do not delve into the psychological factors.…”
Section: Background and Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Place attachment is the residents' loyalty to their place of living developed by place identity and place dependency. While place identity refers to the individuals' perception of identity with respect to the neighborhood, place dependency denotes accommodation of their needs by the neighborhood resources [7,[58][59][60]. Place attachment has been reported to influence recovery of households, for instance, recovery of New Orleans following Hurricane Katrina [13], Rockaway Park, New York [8], and Sea Bright, New Jersey [9], after Hurricane Sandy, and Moore, Oklahoma, in the aftermath of the 2013 tornado [61].…”
Section: Drivers Of Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social capital is referred to as the engine of recovery (Aldrich, 2010(Aldrich, , 2012 and is defined as the collaboration among community members to share resources and to achieve common goals (Jamali and Nejat, 2016). As a contributor to social capital, trust enhanced recovery of western China (Yandong, 2007) and Indiana towns (Sadri et al, 2018).…”
Section: Interactive Driversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, place attachment can affect recovery decisions. Place attachment is the residents' loyalty to their place of living since it accommodates their needs or brings them a sense of identity (Jamali and Nejat, 2016). Chamlee-Wright and Storr (2009) reported influence of sense of place on New Orleans post-Katrina recovery.…”
Section: Interactive Driversmentioning
confidence: 99%