2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbvi.2015.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Place attachment and social legitimacy: Revisiting the sustainable entrepreneurship journey

Abstract: This paper revisits the sustainable entrepreneurship journey by introducing a Ôplace-basedÕ sustainable venture path model. We suggest that distinguishing between emotional (Ôcaring about the placeÕ) and instrumental (Ôusing the placeÕ) place attachment of sustainable entrepreneurs deepens our understanding of how place-based challenges of sustainable venture legitimacy are managed over time. We conclude with avenues for future sustainable entrepreneurship research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
115
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
115
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The field should seek to explore how entrepreneurs are embedded in markets, social systems and territories, what factors influence priorities for the entrepreneur embedded in multiple contexts, and how the embeddedness influences the venturing process. Only three of the papers we reviewed addressed territorial embeddedness of sustainable, purpose‐driven entrepreneurs (Shrivastava and Kennelly, ; Kibler et al ., ; Cohen and Muñoz, ). This is somewhat surprising given the strong relationship between sustainability and local development.…”
Section: Expanding the Boundaries: Looking Aheadmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The field should seek to explore how entrepreneurs are embedded in markets, social systems and territories, what factors influence priorities for the entrepreneur embedded in multiple contexts, and how the embeddedness influences the venturing process. Only three of the papers we reviewed addressed territorial embeddedness of sustainable, purpose‐driven entrepreneurs (Shrivastava and Kennelly, ; Kibler et al ., ; Cohen and Muñoz, ). This is somewhat surprising given the strong relationship between sustainability and local development.…”
Section: Expanding the Boundaries: Looking Aheadmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Entrepreneurs, as previously, mentioned have to be able to influence opinion leaders and key actors in order to exploit their capability of establishing [60] and modifying powerful relationships among different actors [61]. This need reflects the critical nature of ecological sustainable entrepreneurs with the external environment [62][63][64][65], taking on no further distinction or separation between formal and informal institutions [66][67][68], or cooperation and support of each other in networks [69][70][71]. Research shows that by being more inclined to successfully network within and across industries, entrepreneurs leading sustainable enterprises maintain sustainable growth in pursuit of their long-term survival [59,72].…”
Section: Factors For Social Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above, entrepreneurs have to be able to influence opinion leaders and key actors to get the most out of their capability of establishing [101] and modifying powerful relationships among different actors [102]. This need helps make clear the critical nature of ecologically-sustainable entrepreneurs with their external environment [73,[103][104][105]. Here, there is no recognizable further distinction or separation between formal and informal institutions [106][107][108], nor is there cooperation and mutual support in networks [109][110][111].…”
Section: Organizational Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%