2020
DOI: 10.1177/2158244020923368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Place Branding as Participatory Governance? An Interdisciplinary Case Study of Tasmania, Australia

Abstract: Research in both public administration and place development has identified a need to develop more participatory approaches to governing cities and regions. Scholars have identified place branding as one of several potential policy instruments to enable more participatory place development. Recently, academics working in diverse disciplines, including political studies, public administration, and regional development have suggested that an alternative, bottom-up, more participatory approach to place branding c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite widespread academic and increasingly practitioner interest in engagement, the extent to which these routes offer meaningful versus tokenistic engagement remains in dispute (Ripoll González and Gale, 2020). Criticisms include a tendency to opt for a standardised approach, which fails to capture the diversity of the groups involved (Hakala, 2021).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Despite widespread academic and increasingly practitioner interest in engagement, the extent to which these routes offer meaningful versus tokenistic engagement remains in dispute (Ripoll González and Gale, 2020). Criticisms include a tendency to opt for a standardised approach, which fails to capture the diversity of the groups involved (Hakala, 2021).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agency can, for example, be subtly obtained and actioned by local representatives when working collaboratively to shape and share visual narratives of a place (Rebelo et al , 2020). Yet, other studies recognise that participation is not always equally attained and identify tensions that can surface (Ripoll González and Gale, 2020; Green et al , 2016; Kavaratzis and Hatch, 2013). Studies have also begun to map a hierarchy of involvement by categorising actors based on their varying ability to participate (Hakala, 2021; Henninger et al , 2016).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Typically, participation is oriented to increasing input for decisions, and in striving to enrich the input received, it becomes important to make the process broadly accessible to and representative of the general public (Quick and Feldman, 2011). One path towards participatory place branding can been to engage the wider community of stakeholders in a systematic reflection of current and possible alternative practices (Ripoll González and Gale, 2020), where Hakala (2021) emphasizes the importance of effective and genuine “listening”. Interest in involving stakeholders is of course not limited to place branding processes, but rather is an issue for the entire public sector where, for example, public participation in urban planning and management goes back as far as the 1970s (Li et al , 2020).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%