2020
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17186676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Place Effects and Chronic Disease Rates in a Rural State: Evidence from a Triangulation of Methods

Abstract: High rates of chronic diseases and increasing nutritional polarization between different income groups in the United States are issues of concern to policymakers and public health officials. Spatial differences in access to food are mainly blamed as the cause for these nutritional inequalities. This study first detected hot and cold spots of food providers in West Virginia and then used those places in a quasi-experimental method (entropy balancing) to study the effects of those places on diabetes and obesity … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Spanning 13 states from New York to Mississippi, one quarter of the counties that make up this region are classified as rural, the majority of which are found in eastern Kentucky, where the current study takes place [ 12 ]. Research reveals the deep-rooted connection between the scope of specific food outlets—traditional versus nontraditional—and population health [ 9 ], thus supporting the idea that greater obesity prevalence may be influenced by the rural food environment [ 13 ]. Additionally, all 54 counties located in the Appalachian region of Kentucky are classified as rural [ 14 ] and most are economically distressed [ 15 ], thereby limiting the variety and depth of accessibility of healthy food items in these communities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spanning 13 states from New York to Mississippi, one quarter of the counties that make up this region are classified as rural, the majority of which are found in eastern Kentucky, where the current study takes place [ 12 ]. Research reveals the deep-rooted connection between the scope of specific food outlets—traditional versus nontraditional—and population health [ 9 ], thus supporting the idea that greater obesity prevalence may be influenced by the rural food environment [ 13 ]. Additionally, all 54 counties located in the Appalachian region of Kentucky are classified as rural [ 14 ] and most are economically distressed [ 15 ], thereby limiting the variety and depth of accessibility of healthy food items in these communities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%